Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jocular: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→[[Jocular]]: Delete |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*'''Redirect''' to [[joke]]. [[User:Science3456|Science3456]] 19:34, 22 October 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Redirect''' to [[joke]]. [[User:Science3456|Science3456]] 19:34, 22 October 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' as nominated [[User:Squell|squell]] 20:24, 23 October 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' as nominated [[User:Squell|squell]] 20:24, 23 October 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Redirect''' to the [[joke]] article. [[User:169.157.229.87|169.157.229.87]] 16:46, 24 October 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:46, 24 October 2005
This afd nomination was incomplete. Listing now. Delete, will never be more than a dictdef, and already in Wiktionary. —Cryptic (talk) 07:49, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
- Unless someone sees the chance to add a thorough and interesting etymologic explanation to this article (which I really doubt), this will never grow beyond the dicdef stage. Delete. -- SoothingR 07:53, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
- An etymology would belong in the Wiktionary entry, too. —Cryptic (talk) 08:12, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as dicdef (and not a very good one, either). --Sensor 11:42, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to joke. Science3456 19:34, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as nominated squell 20:24, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to the joke article. 169.157.229.87 16:46, 24 October 2005 (UTC)