Jump to content

Talk:BMEzine: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
assessed
Line 13: Line 13:


It seems to be back now. [[User:Rmx256|the infamous rmx]] 00:57, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
It seems to be back now. [[User:Rmx256|the infamous rmx]] 00:57, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

It was never removed in the first place, the statement above is just one more instance of people attempting to harm the website. All rumours spread on the internet have no place on this wiki page.


== Censorship ==
== Censorship ==

Revision as of 02:29, 27 January 2009

WikiProject iconWebsites: Computing Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.
WikiProject iconJournalism Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Re:Drama

I think that users should be informed that Shannon is no longer running BMEzine, whatever the reasons are. In an unemotional fashion. I'll remove ex-wife if you want. -notenderwiggin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.63.203.129 (talk) 21:22, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I really wish someone would write an artice on Shannon. Unfortunately I am not elloquent nor knowledgeable enough to do it myself.

There was an article on Shannon, taken from BME's wiki, but it was deleted, as he wasn't notable enough.

It seems to be back now. the infamous rmx 00:57, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was never removed in the first place, the statement above is just one more instance of people attempting to harm the website. All rumours spread on the internet have no place on this wiki page.

Censorship

I don't know why it doesn't give a little disclaimer for the websites. I'm gonna go ahead and add that, and if for some odd reason, you feel as though these links shouldn't come with a warning...

well, do as you must. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.133.92.185 (talk) 01:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please turn off the links.

Ugh..i clicked the link..although i did see the graphic content warning...I personally think the links should be removed..or not clickable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aginor 27 (talkcontribs) 05:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that if you saw the graphic content warning before clicking the links anything that you viewed to make yourself uncomfortable is your own responsibility. the infamous rmx (talk) 15:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BME Pain Olympics.

I have deleted the reference to the BME Pain Olympics from this wiki article many times and I plan to continue to do so. The latest incarnation of the reference is as follows:

"There is also a video on the internet entitled BME Pain Olympics, which depicts a male dismembering his genitalia with a knife and hatchet. However, whether the video is real or part of the BMEzine is not fully confirmed."

As a long-time IAM and BME member I can personally not attest to the reality of this video, nor do I deny that it or similar content exists on BME. However, I see no reason at all for it to be featured in this article. It's reference is sensationalistic and does nothing but degrade an otherwise well-kept article that manages to keep the admittedly risque content of the BME website out of the wiki. Are there any dissenting opinions? As this is the Wikipedia, I think we need a consensus (and I also don't want an edit war). the infamous rmx (talk) 14:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's no reason why it should be removed. I'm sure a great deal of people (myself included) only searched for BME due to the video. How is it sensationalistic? If 2Girls1Cup can have its own entire entry, surely the Pain Olympics can be referenced on the entry of its sponsor. James (talk) 03:44, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. We should keep the section about BME Pain Olympics. 70.145.15.83 (talk) 01:56, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If we're going to keep this content then it should be rewritten by someone more competent than any of the editors who have contributed to that section. Personally I think it's just an invitation to vandalism and misinterpretation about what BME is all about: it most certainly is not all about entertaining the masses out there by giving them something to point in disgust at. the infamous rmx (talk) 04:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just removed this again:

A notable video that references BME is entitled, "BME Pain Olympics: Final Round". This contraversial video features an FAIL "man" tying a string around his penis and testicles before slicing his penis with a knife and then cutting his testicles out of his scrotum by using a hatchet. The reactions to this video can be found on youtube.com. Ike can be seen killing the guy afterwards since he is made of FAIL.

If this BME Pain Olympics: Final Round needs to be a part of the Wikipedia, it is my opinion that it should not be a part of this article. Since it is some kind of internet sensation, shouldn't it have it's own article like that old All Your Base flap, or Chuck Norris Facts or Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate Destiny? This apparently influential and important video deserves it's own article, not a mention attached to another (/sarchasm). Just because someone 'only searched for BME due to the video' does not make it necessary to have it as a component of this page. Isn't the big deal about it, for the most part, just the reactions that people have to it on YouTube? Since when is YouTube a valid source? the infamous rmx (talk) 18:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Does anyone know why he did it? Rmx you say you can guarantee it's real, so why did he do it? Money, fame? Did he just want a sex change or is he just plain crazy?

I have moved the BME Pain Olympics: Final Round to its own page. I have been a photographer for several of these events and therefore have a credible knowledge of them. I worked pretty hard on that page, so please do not reverse my edits. There is still a link from the first paragraph to it, so it's not like it's gone. Team4Technologies (talk) 13:02, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing incorrect information. Posting on the BME wiki page that there is "Drama" with posts that do not accurately reflect the situation do nothing but cause damage to the owners of the site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.234.17.115 (talk) 15:16, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of simply removing information, continue to state that a conflict occurred and is resolved or still ongoing. --CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 15:19, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What drama occurred? Do you have a reliable source? Evidence? Verifiability? No, you don't. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.234.17.115 (talk) 15:23, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The word "drama" is your word in this page... not mine... but that is irrelevant... "something" occurred and a conflict occurred. To erase it as if it never happened is incorrect. --CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 15:26, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am in the process of moving BME Pain Olympics to its own page. Do not undo this. It needs to be in its own page. Team4Technologies (talk) 15:36, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Song

Is it really required to note that a song by Mortification is playing in the background of this video? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmx256 (talkcontribs) 21:27, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I agree that this little tidbit is a bit random; however, I think it is these random, seemingly meaningless tidbits that make Wikipedia so wonderful. As an example, I was making a mixtape for a friend the over day -- I had pranked this friend by sending him a link to "BME Pain Olympics," so including "Livin' Like a Zombie" (which I was only aware of via this article) was the perfect song for that mixtape. Just my opinion. Arickp (talk) 08:17, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]