Talk:PacketTrap: Difference between revisions
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:It reads like an advertisement to me too. First of all, nothing in this article is cited. Secondly, it could just be me, but the links at the bottom seem dubious. --[[Special:Contributions/24.254.194.26|24.254.194.26]] ([[User talk:24.254.194.26|talk]]) 02:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC) |
:It reads like an advertisement to me too. First of all, nothing in this article is cited. Secondly, it could just be me, but the links at the bottom seem dubious. --[[Special:Contributions/24.254.194.26|24.254.194.26]] ([[User talk:24.254.194.26|talk]]) 02:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
Agreed. Added the advertisement flag. I wouldn't mind fixing it a bit, but there appears to be a VERY active IP address - probably a representative from the company. Too lazy for tug of war. Here's what I think it needs though: |
|||
*A history section before product details |
|||
*Less talk about product features and more about "what does the company do?" |
|||
*Remove the list of articles unless they are references |
|||
*General clean up of marketing stuff |
|||
For starters. |
|||
I don't think the article provides any value as it is now. Should we mark it for speedy deletion? |
|||
Wouldn't mind helping the PR person at PacketTrap create an acceptable article, but again, not a fan of tug-of-war. |
Revision as of 18:19, 27 January 2009
Computing: Networking / Software Unassessed | ||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement
Seems that the article now accurately reflects an objective point of view. Clearly the company is well known in it's space —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.244.55.133 (talk) 16:57, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Who cares about how many IT companies use PacketTrap? And the second section is useless at possible: it seems copied from a booklet. Zulon (talk) 15:00, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry if my reaction was too excessive, but it sounded like an advertisement for me. But at least, the article was not as neutral as possible. Zulon (talk) 09:16, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- It reads like an advertisement to me too. First of all, nothing in this article is cited. Secondly, it could just be me, but the links at the bottom seem dubious. --24.254.194.26 (talk) 02:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Agreed. Added the advertisement flag. I wouldn't mind fixing it a bit, but there appears to be a VERY active IP address - probably a representative from the company. Too lazy for tug of war. Here's what I think it needs though:
- A history section before product details
- Less talk about product features and more about "what does the company do?"
- Remove the list of articles unless they are references
- General clean up of marketing stuff
For starters.
I don't think the article provides any value as it is now. Should we mark it for speedy deletion?
Wouldn't mind helping the PR person at PacketTrap create an acceptable article, but again, not a fan of tug-of-war.
- Unassessed Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- Unassessed Computer networking articles
- Unknown-importance Computer networking articles
- Unassessed Computer networking articles of Unknown-importance
- All Computer networking articles
- Unassessed software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- Unassessed software articles of Unknown-importance
- All Software articles
- All Computing articles