Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2059 (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m cat |
Orrelly Man (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Only one, astronomical, scheduled event. Does not qualify as notable. [[User:S8333631|Hello, My Name Is SithMAN8]] ([[User talk:S8333631|talk]]) 23:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC) |
Only one, astronomical, scheduled event. Does not qualify as notable. [[User:S8333631|Hello, My Name Is SithMAN8]] ([[User talk:S8333631|talk]]) 23:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. (Alternatively, merge [[2050]]–[[2059]] into [[2050s]].) Part of a family of articles. I'd say we should keep these unless all of the decade were merged. — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 23:55, 27 January 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''. (Alternatively, merge [[2050]]–[[2059]] into [[2050s]].) Part of a family of articles. I'd say we should keep these unless all of the decade were merged. — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 23:55, 27 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' per [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]]; and an astronomical event is notable. --[[User:Orrelly Man|Orrelly Man]] ([[User talk:Orrelly Man|talk]]) 19:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:58, 28 January 2009
AfDs for this article:
- 2059 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Only one, astronomical, scheduled event. Does not qualify as notable. Hello, My Name Is SithMAN8 (talk) 23:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. (Alternatively, merge 2050–2059 into 2050s.) Part of a family of articles. I'd say we should keep these unless all of the decade were merged. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:55, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Arthur Rubin; and an astronomical event is notable. --Orrelly Man (talk) 19:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)