Jump to content

User talk:VoteSchiff: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
blocked
 
m Asking for unblock. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for {{#if:24 hours|a period of '''24 hours'''|a short time}} in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for engaging in an [[WP:EDITWAR|edit war]]{{#if:Peter Schiff|&#32;at [[:Peter Schiff]]}}. Please be more careful to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] or seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]] rather than engaging in an [[WP:EW|edit war]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:— <small><b><span style="border:1px solid #20406F;padding:1px 3px;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;">[[User:Aitias|<font color="#20406F">Aitias</font>]]</span></b></small> <span style="color: #999;">//</span>&nbsp;[[User talk:Aitias|''discussion'']] 03:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)|— <small><b><span style="border:1px solid #20406F;padding:1px 3px;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;">[[User:Aitias|<font color="#20406F">Aitias</font>]]</span></b></small> <span style="color: #999;">//</span>&nbsp;[[User talk:Aitias|''discussion'']] 03:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for {{#if:24 hours|a period of '''24 hours'''|a short time}} in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for engaging in an [[WP:EDITWAR|edit war]]{{#if:Peter Schiff|&#32;at [[:Peter Schiff]]}}. Please be more careful to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] or seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]] rather than engaging in an [[WP:EW|edit war]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:— <small><b><span style="border:1px solid #20406F;padding:1px 3px;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;">[[User:Aitias|<font color="#20406F">Aitias</font>]]</span></b></small> <span style="color: #999;">//</span>&nbsp;[[User talk:Aitias|''discussion'']] 03:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)|— <small><b><span style="border:1px solid #20406F;padding:1px 3px;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;">[[User:Aitias|<font color="#20406F">Aitias</font>]]</span></b></small> <span style="color: #999;">//</span>&nbsp;[[User talk:Aitias|''discussion'']] 03:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->

{{unblock|I can fully understand why both were blocked. I appreciate you helping in this situation. You'll notice that all I did was undo the deletions of the text that I had actually contributed, since it was valid for the article. I will try to be more careful, to try a dispute resolution, in the future. I am a Wikipedia novice, so I was not aware of dispute resolutions. After the three reverts, I sought out a way to get help and found the 3 revert rule, which I also didn't know about ahead of time. Ajcreative is trying to keep that sentence off, for business reasons and I think that is not respectable. So, thanks again for intervening!}}

Revision as of 04:15, 8 February 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for engaging in an edit war at Peter Schiff. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — Aitias // discussion 03:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

VoteSchiff (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I can fully understand why both were blocked. I appreciate you helping in this situation. You'll notice that all I did was undo the deletions of the text that I had actually contributed, since it was valid for the article. I will try to be more careful, to try a dispute resolution, in the future. I am a Wikipedia novice, so I was not aware of dispute resolutions. After the three reverts, I sought out a way to get help and found the 3 revert rule, which I also didn't know about ahead of time. Ajcreative is trying to keep that sentence off, for business reasons and I think that is not respectable. So, thanks again for intervening!

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I can fully understand why both were blocked. I appreciate you helping in this situation. You'll notice that all I did was undo the deletions of the text that I had actually contributed, since it was valid for the article. I will try to be more careful, to try a dispute resolution, in the future. I am a Wikipedia novice, so I was not aware of dispute resolutions. After the three reverts, I sought out a way to get help and found the 3 revert rule, which I also didn't know about ahead of time. Ajcreative is trying to keep that sentence off, for business reasons and I think that is not respectable. So, thanks again for intervening! |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I can fully understand why both were blocked. I appreciate you helping in this situation. You'll notice that all I did was undo the deletions of the text that I had actually contributed, since it was valid for the article. I will try to be more careful, to try a dispute resolution, in the future. I am a Wikipedia novice, so I was not aware of dispute resolutions. After the three reverts, I sought out a way to get help and found the 3 revert rule, which I also didn't know about ahead of time. Ajcreative is trying to keep that sentence off, for business reasons and I think that is not respectable. So, thanks again for intervening! |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I can fully understand why both were blocked. I appreciate you helping in this situation. You'll notice that all I did was undo the deletions of the text that I had actually contributed, since it was valid for the article. I will try to be more careful, to try a dispute resolution, in the future. I am a Wikipedia novice, so I was not aware of dispute resolutions. After the three reverts, I sought out a way to get help and found the 3 revert rule, which I also didn't know about ahead of time. Ajcreative is trying to keep that sentence off, for business reasons and I think that is not respectable. So, thanks again for intervening! |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}