User talk:VoteSchiff: Difference between revisions
minor fix |
VoteSchiff (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:If you promise not to do any reverts on that article again (i.e. to stop edit warring) until there's a clear [[Wikipedia:consensus|consensus]] I'd feel comfortable unblocking. — <small><b><span style="border:1px solid #20406F;padding:1px 3px;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;">[[User:Aitias|<font color="#20406F">Aitias</font>]]</span></b></small> <span style="color: #999;">//</span> [[User talk:Aitias|''discussion'']] 04:24, 8 February 2009 (UTC) |
:If you promise not to do any reverts on that article again (i.e. to stop edit warring) until there's a clear [[Wikipedia:consensus|consensus]] I'd feel comfortable unblocking. — <small><b><span style="border:1px solid #20406F;padding:1px 3px;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;">[[User:Aitias|<font color="#20406F">Aitias</font>]]</span></b></small> <span style="color: #999;">//</span> [[User talk:Aitias|''discussion'']] 04:24, 8 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
:'''VoteSchiff Reply:''' Do you consider my original contribution valid? All I want is that the contribution stand, as is. But, yes, of course I will promise not participate in edit warring (ultimately undoing someone else's edit war against me). -- [[User:VoteSchiff|VoteSchiff]] ([[User talk:VoteSchiff#top|talk]]) 04:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:41, 8 February 2009
VoteSchiff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I can fully understand why both were blocked. I appreciate you helping in this situation. You'll notice that all I did was undo the deletions of the text that I had actually contributed, since it was valid for the article. I will try to be more careful, to try a dispute resolution, in the future. I am a Wikipedia novice, so I was not aware of dispute resolutions. After the three reverts, I sought out a way to get help and found the 3 revert rule, which I also didn't know about ahead of time. Ajcreative is trying to keep that sentence off, for business reasons and I think that is not respectable. So, thanks again for intervening! |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I can fully understand why both were blocked. I appreciate you helping in this situation. You'll notice that all I did was undo the deletions of the text that I had actually contributed, since it was valid for the article. I will try to be more careful, to try a dispute resolution, in the future. I am a Wikipedia novice, so I was not aware of dispute resolutions. After the three reverts, I sought out a way to get help and found the 3 revert rule, which I also didn't know about ahead of time. Ajcreative is trying to keep that sentence off, for business reasons and I think that is not respectable. So, thanks again for intervening! |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I can fully understand why both were blocked. I appreciate you helping in this situation. You'll notice that all I did was undo the deletions of the text that I had actually contributed, since it was valid for the article. I will try to be more careful, to try a dispute resolution, in the future. I am a Wikipedia novice, so I was not aware of dispute resolutions. After the three reverts, I sought out a way to get help and found the 3 revert rule, which I also didn't know about ahead of time. Ajcreative is trying to keep that sentence off, for business reasons and I think that is not respectable. So, thanks again for intervening! |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
VoteSchiff (talk) 04:18, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- If you promise not to do any reverts on that article again (i.e. to stop edit warring) until there's a clear consensus I'd feel comfortable unblocking. — Aitias // discussion 04:24, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- VoteSchiff Reply: Do you consider my original contribution valid? All I want is that the contribution stand, as is. But, yes, of course I will promise not participate in edit warring (ultimately undoing someone else's edit war against me). -- VoteSchiff (talk) 04:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)