Jump to content

User talk:RedRooster96: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Will speak privately
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Hi.
==Here you go==
==Here you go==
'''[[User:RedRooster96|<font color="red">Red</font>]][[User talk:RedRooster96|<font color="red">Rooster</font>]][[Special:Contributions/RedRooster96|<font color="red">96</font>]]'''
'''[[User:RedRooster96|<font color="red">Red</font>]][[User talk:RedRooster96|<font color="red">Rooster</font>]][[Special:Contributions/RedRooster96|<font color="red">96</font>]]'''

Revision as of 22:17, 9 February 2009

Hi.

Here you go

RedRooster96

Sorry; can't get the talk link to work. Oh yeah, because this is the talk page. Never mind. Serendipodous 20:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats Red!

The Professional Wrestling Barnstar
You are one sly dog man! You rock. See you tommorrow. RedRooster96 18:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Michelle McCool, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SpitfireTally-ho! 19:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heya, if you can provide a good source feel free to add the information about the undertaker again, thanks SpitfireTally-ho! 19:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've just seen that discussion now, we'll just wait and see if that user provides a source. No worries, and thankyou for not getting all defensive as others might have done, happy editing! SpitfireTally-ho! 19:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WWE title history since Draft (2008)

Hi,

I don't understand what this article is about; could you possibly expand the introduction? Bladeofgrass (talk) 22:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I seem to have totally addressed the wrong person! How did I not go for the article's creator? :) Bladeofgrass (talk) 15:06, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Droz

Saw you don't know Droz. Droz is a former wrestler who became a Quadriplegic after a botched powerbomb by D'Lo Brown. He has no use of his legs. He is still employed by the company and writes wwe.com articles as well as ppv predictions. He has a article here at Droz. JakeDHS0719:24, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image

File:Undertaker wrestling Edge - bad quality.jpg appears to be a picture of a match you took from your TV. Not that you can't do this. Read WP:IMAGES for more details I am going to have to prod it for deletions. SimonKSK 22:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Undertaker wrestling Edge - bad quality.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Undertaker wrestling Edge - bad quality.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SimonKSK 22:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No you can't because the video of the match you are watching is being taped by someone else, so it is not yours in any way. SimonKSK 22:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. Just don't do it again. SimonKSK 22:39, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I deleted this as it was copyright. As a general rule of thumb, ask yourself, do I own this? (note, not the picture itself but what is in the picture). In this case you took a picture of a copyrighted broadcast (note, if you were there in person the situation would likley be different). Please carefully choose what you will upload or you may get blocked for repeated violations. Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 17:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Signatures

Is there a reason why you're refactoring other editor's signatures? HAZardousMATTtoxic 16:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, ignore me. I was looking at the update through the page diff rather than scrolling through the whole mess. I didn't see that the signature threw up. I can AGF on that. HAZardousMATTtoxic 16:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]