Talk:God: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
==Rosicrucian== |
==Rosicrucian== |
||
surely the lengthy Rosicrucian account should be delegated to some sub-article? [[User:Baad|Baad]] 07:44, 26 October 2005 (UTC) |
surely the lengthy Rosicrucian account should be delegated to some sub-article? [[User:Baad|Baad]] 07:44, 26 October 2005 (UTC) |
||
== This page requires editing == |
|||
Someone has changed several headlings into things severely innapropriate for Wikipedia. These things must be changed immediatly |
|||
Revision as of 17:53, 31 October 2005
archives
- An archive of older discussion can be found at Talk:God/archive 1.
- An archive of discussions from year 2003 can be found at Talk:God/archive 2
- An archive of discussions from 1st quarter of 2004 (from January to March) can be found at Talk:God/archive 3
- Talk:God/Archive 4
- Talk:God/Archive 5
- Talk:God/Archive 6
- Talk:God/Archive 7
- Talk:God/Archive 8
Dispute Regarding Kabbalistic Definiton of God
I edited my remarks and inserted them into the text of the article.
Mobius1ski 23:42, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
Immanent v. Imminent
In the definition section the former was changed to the latter. God may be imminent (in which case get down on your knees and pray), but immanent is the correct term here ie. pervading the universe.--shtove 11:30, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
- I tend to think he's both, but I agree with your assessment. Sam Spade 12:07, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
Names of God section
Anonymous user 82.10.40.207 posted some potentially inflammatory stuff, which I reverted, and suggested that we discuss here before agreeing to add to the article. The edits include:
- Different names for God exist within different religious traditions, like Berber Amon and Egyptian Ra, the original fathers of monotheism...
- The name Allah was derived from the Arabic Sun-Goddess Allat, who in turn was a form of the Semitic Al or El or Allilat, who in turn was a form of the African-Berber Tala, taken into Latin as Latona...
I just thought the community should discuss these additions before agreeing to include them. KHM03 19:37, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- I don't agree to include them - particularly as, lacking a source, and mostly containing conjectural notions I've never seen before, they look an awful lot like "Original Research"... Codex Sinaiticus 20:44, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Similar edits were added by Anonymous user 82.68.147.102, then deleted. I'm hoping this editor (whom I assume to be the same as 82.10.40.207) will discuss the issue here. Both anonymous users have been invited. KHM03 16:20, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- I think it is valid to includ the Tolkien reference here, see the article on Eru Ilúvatar. --Fnord
Falsum?
I encountered the word falsum in the definition section; from the context it means contradiction, but I can't seem to find an actual definition, and it seemed jarring. Should this be changed to contradiction or a synonym of it? Gururvishnu 03:32, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
- Falsum is appropriate. See falsum --172.195.191.202 18:00, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
Rosicrucian
surely the lengthy Rosicrucian account should be delegated to some sub-article? Baad 07:44, 26 October 2005 (UTC)