User talk:Doulos Christos: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:29, 16 February 2009

Welcome!

Hello, Doulos Christos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 15:48, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

omg im soo sorry about my unconstrucive edits plz forgive me

IM NOT FORGIVING YOU.... YOU FAG BUTT MUNCH —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.124.49.186 (talk) 22:49, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to my recent unconstructive edit on Portsmouth Grammar School, how can the hockey team have been unsuccessful on both occasions when we had a victory in the first? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.88.41.45 (talk) 12:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for rollback

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback can be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! Tiptoety ^talk 06:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Doulos Christos (talk) 11:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bling

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your good work keeping the encyclopedia clean. Politizer ^talk/_contribs 12:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, sir! (...or ma'am?) Doulos Christos (talk) 18:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit

Why did you revert my edit, it was very logical to the talk section of Arizona??? Metro Sex (talk) 12:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A recent edit.

Hi, you made this edit which actually reverted a reversion of vandalism (thus restoring the vandalism). I reverted your edit using Twinkle, but I wanted to let you know that I'm pretty sure you didn't intend to vandalize that page and simply got confused in the chain of reverts (as I have done many times myself). In any event, your edit history shows a strong record of fighting vandalism, so thanks and keep up the good work. --Loonymonkey (talk) 03:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ack, it's my first time trying out Huggle. I'll take a look over the rest of my contributions to make sure I did okay the rest of the time. Thanks for letting me know. Sorry about that! Doulos Christos • talk 03:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

WikiThanks

Thank you for the quick revert on my guestbook. :) Queenie ^Talk 17:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure! :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 19:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit

Why did you remove my warning here?--Giants27 T C 01:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uh-oh, looks like we both tried reverting and warning at the same time and WP:HUGGLE got confused. Sorry! :) Doulos Christos ♥ talk 01:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, was just curious in your reasoning. Thanks!--Giants27 T C 03:26, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

Please stop reverting my edits at Bandit (disambiguation) and tagging me as a vandal. These have all been good faith edits to move the page, as discussed on the discussion page, to have a separate article for the television series. The automated revisions can be incredibly frustrating as we are all working to improve this project.--Stadler981 (talk) 01:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I figured out why that was happening - because you were inappropriately doing a cut-and-paste move. I asked at WP:AN that someone fix the pages that are messed up now and maybe they can explain why what you are doing is incorrect. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 02:01, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clarifying, though I would be remiss to not point out that for a novice user to be frustrated, confused, labeled as a vandal, and fairly insulted for attempting good faith edits in a way that was the prior standard, is probably not the best for a project hoping to draw help from everyone. Obviously that change was not up to you, but please be understanding and perhaps less immediately condemning and belittling to people who are trying to help.--Stadler981 (talk) 02:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Hanssen

I understand your general suspicion of vandalism in the case of the Hanssen article, however, I question what constitutes the informational value of Hanssen's sexual preferences. Whether or not he shared sex video tapes or had contacts with prostitutes does not represent an informational value. On which ground would you leave this information there, then? A biography should not the place where ALL information about the respective person are gathered - but if so, why not include his eye color and hair color? Simply because the information about particular aspects of a person's life is there, i.e. available, and accessible somewhere (and justifiable through references), does not state anything about the informational value. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.100.126.154 (talk) 22:16, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:79.67.141.243

this is a sock of a banned user harassing always the same person. I reported him to AIV for inmediate blocking --Enric Naval (talk) 01:37, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Crime and the Glory of Commander Suzdal

as can be seen i meant to type this: The Crime and the Glory of Commander Suzdal. Sadly i typed this: the crime and the glory of commander suzdal. This mistake would have took me all of 30 seconds to relieze and correct. However you decided to leave me a message instead. For future reference why dont you spend more time on trying to fix articles then bug editors. A simply internet search would have found my error and you could have corrected it. instead you went with a revert. THIS IS NOT APPRECIATED ONE BIT BY ANYONE EVER!! Let me ask you something: how could you possible know every single sci-fi story ever written!? the answer is: you cant. If you know even the slightest amount of knowledge about this field you wouldnt have reverted my edit. obviously you spent all of 1 second looking at what i did and then reverting it.

Please do not bother responding to this.

@@ Line 64: / Line 64: @@
 this is a sock of a banned user harassing always the same person. I reported him to AIV for inmediate blocking --[[User:Enric Naval|Enric Naval]] ([[User talk:Enric Naval|talk]]) 01:37, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
+== The Crime and the Glory of Commander Suzdal ==
+as can be seen i meant to type this: The Crime and the Glory of Commander Suzdal. Sadly i typed this: the crime and the glory of commander suzdal. This mistake would have took me all of 30 seconds to relieze and correct. However you decided to leave me a message instead. For future reference why dont you spend more time on trying to fix articles then bug editors. A simply internet search would have found my error and you could have corrected it. instead you went with a revert. THIS IS NOT APPRECIATED ONE BIT BY ANYONE EVER!! Let me ask you something: how could you possible know every single sci-fi story ever written!? the answer is: you cant. If you know even the slightest amount of knowledge about this field you wouldnt have reverted my edit. obviously you spent all of 1 second looking at what i did and then reverting it.
+Please do not bother responding to this.