Talk:List of computer simulation software: Difference between revisions
Caporaletti (talk | contribs) Request of indications for introducing a new link to a computer simulation software |
thanks for making me redo my previous post of a very valid open source link |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
There's a tremendous amount of external links and redlinks in this list; unless sources can be provided I'm not sure this meets [[WP:V]]. Please re-add them when an article has been created, or there's a reliable source we can use. [[User:Kuru|<font color = "#cd853f">'''Kuru'''</font>]] [[User talk:Kuru|<font color = "#f5deb3"><sup>''talk''</sup></font>]] 19:29, 18 January 2009 (UTC) |
There's a tremendous amount of external links and redlinks in this list; unless sources can be provided I'm not sure this meets [[WP:V]]. Please re-add them when an article has been created, or there's a reliable source we can use. [[User:Kuru|<font color = "#cd853f">'''Kuru'''</font>]] [[User talk:Kuru|<font color = "#f5deb3"><sup>''talk''</sup></font>]] 19:29, 18 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
There should be a dispute, here. How come our open source link to Tortuga has been removed? I saw various references to "link farms" and "self-promotion links" - so what? Is not the name of the page "List of computer simulation software" ?? Aren't there supposed to be links to computer simulation software? What do you mean, "reliable source" ? Our project, the Tortuga DES, had a link to the homepage, examples, documentation, and source code. I think that qualifies - do you want me to get Microsoft to endorse it before you'll treat it as "valid" ? |
|||
Why would you remove every link that doesn't have their own wikipedia page? That hardly makes sense. Our homepage with all of the descriptive info lives permanently at another URL, and I am sure that is true for others. Besides, the last time I added a page about a piece of software, TUFDefender, it was removed by an administrator as "patent nonsense" and "self-promotional." |
|||
You really need to decide what you want out of a page called "List of...." - DUH, how about a list?! |
|||
Revision as of 18:49, 20 February 2009
 | Computing Unassessed | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
External links
There's a tremendous amount of external links and redlinks in this list; unless sources can be provided I'm not sure this meets WP:V. Please re-add them when an article has been created, or there's a reliable source we can use. Kuru talk 19:29, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
There should be a dispute, here. How come our open source link to Tortuga has been removed? I saw various references to "link farms" and "self-promotion links" - so what? Is not the name of the page "List of computer simulation software" ?? Aren't there supposed to be links to computer simulation software? What do you mean, "reliable source" ? Our project, the Tortuga DES, had a link to the homepage, examples, documentation, and source code. I think that qualifies - do you want me to get Microsoft to endorse it before you'll treat it as "valid" ?
Why would you remove every link that doesn't have their own wikipedia page? That hardly makes sense. Our homepage with all of the descriptive info lives permanently at another URL, and I am sure that is true for others. Besides, the last time I added a page about a piece of software, TUFDefender, it was removed by an administrator as "patent nonsense" and "self-promotional."
You really need to decide what you want out of a page called "List of...." - DUH, how about a list?!
Dear Sirs, I would like to add a reference to the EICASLAB article in the section related to commercial computer simulation software. EICASLAB is a suite of tools devoted to the design of control system architectures, including specific features for plant and control simulation. I specify that I have seen that the EICASLAB article has been marked as orphaned so I am working for helping in de-orphaning it. Let me know if I can add such a reference. Thank you so much for your help. Caporaletti (talk) 13:31, 17 February 2009 (UTC)