User talk:MagdaOakewoman: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Yonkinator (talk | contribs) →Kudos: new section |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Today I have encountered Orlady. As shown above, she has left two notices to me, and reported me in another section as a 'sockpuppet'. I can only deduce that she is doing so because I have tweaked a couple of her projects. As I invite other editors to see, my tweaks were very minor and involved punctuation and grammar. In one case, I saw that she had summarily removed a photo from a particular posting because she apparently didn't like the original contributor. As I said, if she wishes to do so, she should prove that it is a copyrighted photo. I saw no allegations of this: Therefore, the picture should remain. It seems as if this is a situation in which newcomers aren't welcomed under any circumstances. Of course it could merely be that Orlady feels as if things aren't going her way. I am not sure why she perceives such minor contributions as threatening. [[User:MagdaOakewoman|MagdaOakewoman]] ([[User talk:MagdaOakewoman#top|talk]]) 23:54, 23 February 2009 (UTC) |
Today I have encountered Orlady. As shown above, she has left two notices to me, and reported me in another section as a 'sockpuppet'. I can only deduce that she is doing so because I have tweaked a couple of her projects. As I invite other editors to see, my tweaks were very minor and involved punctuation and grammar. In one case, I saw that she had summarily removed a photo from a particular posting because she apparently didn't like the original contributor. As I said, if she wishes to do so, she should prove that it is a copyrighted photo. I saw no allegations of this: Therefore, the picture should remain. It seems as if this is a situation in which newcomers aren't welcomed under any circumstances. Of course it could merely be that Orlady feels as if things aren't going her way. I am not sure why she perceives such minor contributions as threatening. [[User:MagdaOakewoman|MagdaOakewoman]] ([[User talk:MagdaOakewoman#top|talk]]) 23:54, 23 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Kudos == |
|||
Kudos to you for your recent helpful contributions to several New Rochelle community articles. You raised some good points while defending yourself against a blocked user charge against you. KUDOS!! Perhaps you have some additional information or imagery to contribute also? --[[User:Yonkinator|Yonkinator]] ([[User talk:Yonkinator|talk]]) 07:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 07:12, 24 February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Category:Lists of Registered Historic Places by state, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Orlady (talk) 15:16, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Orlady, who are YOU? MagdaOakewoman (talk) 16:00, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Category:Lists of Registered Historic Places by state. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Your "grammatical corrections" do not comply with Wikipedia's Manual of Style and they had the effect of removing valid categories and replacing them with dysfunctional redlinks. Furthermore, altering my category move proposal is disruptive to the process. If you don't like the proposal, comment at WP:CfD; don't alter the template on the category. --Orlady (talk) 16:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Orlady
Today I have encountered Orlady. As shown above, she has left two notices to me, and reported me in another section as a 'sockpuppet'. I can only deduce that she is doing so because I have tweaked a couple of her projects. As I invite other editors to see, my tweaks were very minor and involved punctuation and grammar. In one case, I saw that she had summarily removed a photo from a particular posting because she apparently didn't like the original contributor. As I said, if she wishes to do so, she should prove that it is a copyrighted photo. I saw no allegations of this: Therefore, the picture should remain. It seems as if this is a situation in which newcomers aren't welcomed under any circumstances. Of course it could merely be that Orlady feels as if things aren't going her way. I am not sure why she perceives such minor contributions as threatening. MagdaOakewoman (talk) 23:54, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Kudos
Kudos to you for your recent helpful contributions to several New Rochelle community articles. You raised some good points while defending yourself against a blocked user charge against you. KUDOS!! Perhaps you have some additional information or imagery to contribute also? --Yonkinator (talk) 07:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC)