Jump to content

Talk:Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progressions: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Add maths rating/Comments using AWB
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
: Chowla proved there are infinitely many three consecutive terms in every arithmetic progression. We should also correct this piece of sentence:
: Chowla proved there are infinitely many three consecutive terms in every arithmetic progression. We should also correct this piece of sentence:
:: ''...where n is a...'' --[[User:XJamRastafire|XJamRastafire]] 12:28 Oct 11, 2002 (UTC)
:: ''...where n is a...'' --[[User:XJamRastafire|XJamRastafire]] 12:28 Oct 11, 2002 (UTC)


I think the part
<blockquote>
Note that the theorem does not say that there are infinitely many consecutive terms in the arithmetic progression

a, a+d, a+2d, a+3d, ...,
which are prime.
</blockquote>
Would be easier to read if it said "Note that the theorem does not say that there are infinitely many consecutive prime terms in the arithmetic progression..."--or perhaps better: "...infinitely many consecutive primes...".

Revision as of 01:34, 5 March 2009

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconMathematics Start‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.
Chowla proved this for the case of three consecutive terms.

What exactly did Chowla prove? AxelBoldt 02:20 Oct 10, 2002 (UTC)

Chowla proved there are infinitely many three consecutive terms in every arithmetic progression. We should also correct this piece of sentence:
...where n is a... --XJamRastafire 12:28 Oct 11, 2002 (UTC)


I think the part

Note that the theorem does not say that there are infinitely many consecutive terms in the arithmetic progression

a, a+d, a+2d, a+3d, ..., which are prime.

Would be easier to read if it said "Note that the theorem does not say that there are infinitely many consecutive prime terms in the arithmetic progression..."--or perhaps better: "...infinitely many consecutive primes...".