Jump to content

User talk:TwilligToves: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 5d) to User talk:BuddingJournalist/Archives/2009/February.
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:


wanna !vote on [[WT:WIAFA]]? [[User:Ling.Nut.Public|Ling.Nut.Public]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut.Public|talk]]) 09:08, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
wanna !vote on [[WT:WIAFA]]? [[User:Ling.Nut.Public|Ling.Nut.Public]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut.Public|talk]]) 09:08, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

== Reference critique ==

Hey Journalist, I was wondering if you would mind going over the references of the [[Spokane, Washington]] article. Its a great article, but I think the references section might be problematic in a FAC, and I dont know which ones would tank a nomination. It would really help me if I knew exactly which ones need to be re-referenced (mainly because of bias concerns). If you do decide to do it, feel free to post the critique right on my talk page since Im the only active editor of the article. If you would like to help, notify me here or on my talk page so I can stop looking for reviewers. Thanks! [[Special:Contributions/134.121.247.116|134.121.247.116]] ([[User talk:134.121.247.116|talk]]) 00:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:06, 10 March 2009

Template:Archive box collapsible

Copyvio aspects

I have made several edits to solve that problem. In the paragraph begining with "Depite the lack" I've simply changed the order and many things more. What do you think? OboeCrack (talk) 12:48, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, TwilligToves. You have new messages at Drilnoth's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Drilnoth (talk) 17:45, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jinnai

You should just ignore him. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 04:12, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FAC review

I have replied to your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Federal Bridge Gross Weight Formula, if you would like to take the time to address my reply it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 14:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wanna !vote on WT:WIAFA?

wanna !vote on WT:WIAFA? Ling.Nut.Public (talk) 09:08, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference critique

Hey Journalist, I was wondering if you would mind going over the references of the Spokane, Washington article. Its a great article, but I think the references section might be problematic in a FAC, and I dont know which ones would tank a nomination. It would really help me if I knew exactly which ones need to be re-referenced (mainly because of bias concerns). If you do decide to do it, feel free to post the critique right on my talk page since Im the only active editor of the article. If you would like to help, notify me here or on my talk page so I can stop looking for reviewers. Thanks! 134.121.247.116 (talk) 00:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]