User talk:Mannheim 34: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:19, 19 March 2009

fall in this definition.

For example: does these (pretty informative) pages (that you just removed) contain objectionable amounts of advertising? Please help me because I'm not able to find it.

Please stop now, it can be easily considered vandalism. I will revert any edit of this type I will find. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 14:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I answered here. Just a question: did you take time to take a look at the references you removed and their context within the article or did you simply check the "dealer list" and removed any weblink to these domains? Please understand that you are damaging the project. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 22:45, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ps. References on Wikipedia are rarely to "primary sources": Wikipedia:Reliable sources#Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. Basilicofresco (msg) 23:10, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete these messages. They can be useful in future. Wikipedia users do not usually delete other people's messages, especially when there are conflicting points of view. Thanks. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 19:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-==Inappropriate link removal==
+ fall in this definition.
-Please stop removing permitted and useful links from meteorite-related articles.
-I suggest you to read carefully [[Wikipedia:External links]]: as you can see, there just a suggestion to avoid links to ''"web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services, or to web pages with objectionable amounts of advertising"''. Only very few pages you removed (eg. http://catchafallingstar.com/sa.htm) fall in this definition.
 For example: does these (pretty informative) pages ([[Special:Contributions/Mannheim_34|that you just removed]]) contain ''objectionable amounts of advertising''? Please help me because I'm not able to find it.
 * http://www.meteorlab.com/METEORLAB2001dev/abeetxt.htm