User talk:85.144.120.49: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not add [[Wikipedia:Libel|defamatory]] content to Wikipedia{{#if:File talk:Virgin Killer.jpg|, as you did to [[:File talk:Virgin Killer.jpg]]}}. If you would like to experiment please use the [[WP:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-defamatory2 --> - [[User:Rklawton|Rklawton]] ([[User talk:Rklawton|talk]]) 20:05, 19 March 2009 (UTC) |
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not add [[Wikipedia:Libel|defamatory]] content to Wikipedia{{#if:File talk:Virgin Killer.jpg|, as you did to [[:File talk:Virgin Killer.jpg]]}}. If you would like to experiment please use the [[WP:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-defamatory2 --> - [[User:Rklawton|Rklawton]] ([[User talk:Rklawton|talk]]) 20:05, 19 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
: |
:These point is about defamation on articles but we are discussing an issue on the discussion page plus '''there is no defamation''' on my comment so please do not revert opinions that you disagree. I said... |
||
{{cquote|I contend that Wikipedia is not the only promoting the pornography with children here but all those who voted to keep the cover on this article. Only the mafia behind Camera's editors have made it possible. Pedophiles are also voting here to keep pornography supporting Camera's teenagers. I recommend to amend this situation by '''respecting the law''' and removing the picture forever.}} |
{{cquote|I contend that Wikipedia is not the only promoting the pornography with children here but all those who voted to keep the cover on this article. Only the mafia behind Camera's editors have made it possible. Pedophiles are also voting here to keep pornography supporting Camera's teenagers. I recommend to amend this situation by '''respecting the law''' and removing the picture forever.}} |
||
And '''that's pubic information'''[http://mashable.com/2008/05/08/erik-moeller-pedophilia/][http://indymedia.org.nz/newswire/display/71645/index.php][http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2007/07/31/lindsay-ashford-pedophile-web-site-outrages-parents/], even the FBI accused Wikipedia for promoting pornography with children, UK Internet providers blocked some page or even the entire encyclopedia to protect children and avoid pedophiles enjoy and share this material. So I repeat, '''Do not remove comments that you disagree''', unless you have another interest besides "to control defamation" behind your actions.--[[Special:Contributions/85.144.120.49|85.144.120.49]] ([[User talk:85.144.120.49#top|talk]]) 20:58, 19 March 2009 (UTC) |
And '''that's pubic information'''[http://mashable.com/2008/05/08/erik-moeller-pedophilia/][http://indymedia.org.nz/newswire/display/71645/index.php][http://rosedesrochers.todays-woman.net/2007/07/31/lindsay-ashford-pedophile-web-site-outrages-parents/], even the FBI accused Wikipedia for promoting pornography with children, UK Internet providers blocked some page or even the entire encyclopedia to protect children and avoid pedophiles enjoy and share this material. So I repeat, '''Do not remove comments that you disagree''', unless you have another interest besides "to control defamation" behind your actions.--[[Special:Contributions/85.144.120.49|85.144.120.49]] ([[User talk:85.144.120.49#top|talk]]) 20:58, 19 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 21:01, 19 March 2009
Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to File talk:Virgin Killer.jpg. If you would like to experiment please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Rklawton (talk) 20:05, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- These point is about defamation on articles but we are discussing an issue on the discussion page plus there is no defamation on my comment so please do not revert opinions that you disagree. I said...
| “ | I contend that Wikipedia is not the only promoting the pornography with children here but all those who voted to keep the cover on this article. Only the mafia behind Camera's editors have made it possible. Pedophiles are also voting here to keep pornography supporting Camera's teenagers. I recommend to amend this situation by respecting the law and removing the picture forever. | ” |
And that's pubic information[1][2][3], even the FBI accused Wikipedia for promoting pornography with children, UK Internet providers blocked some page or even the entire encyclopedia to protect children and avoid pedophiles enjoy and share this material. So I repeat, Do not remove comments that you disagree, unless you have another interest besides "to control defamation" behind your actions.--85.144.120.49 (talk) 20:58, 19 March 2009 (UTC)