Talk:Lionbridge: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The title "union-busting" record could be questioned (IMHO it is appropriate), but not the fact that such an occurrence took place. |
The title "union-busting" record could be questioned (IMHO it is appropriate), but not the fact that such an occurrence took place. |
||
[[User:Castorx|Castorx]] ([[User talk:Castorx|talk]]) 12:21, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
[[User:Castorx|Castorx]] ([[User talk:Castorx|talk]]) 12:21, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Article needs work == |
|||
I read this article and looked at the Lionbridge web page. This article seems more like a plug for the companies services than encyclopedic content. It needs major revisions. I question the Neutrality of the article. |
|||
Revision as of 20:42, 24 March 2009
Some content removed due to lack of adherence to Wikipedia:Verifiability and/or Wikipedia:Neutrality policies. Jzz3424 (talk) 20:25, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
The content removed by Jzz3424 concerning the case of DerKervorkian was well documented and confirmed by a reliable source. There was no reason to remove it: 1 DerKevorkian v. Lionbridge Technologies, No. 04-cv-01160-LTB-CBS, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4191 (D. Colo. Jan. 26, 2006), *[DerKevorkian v. Lionbridge] The case of the fired union founder was described here:
The title "union-busting" record could be questioned (IMHO it is appropriate), but not the fact that such an occurrence took place. Castorx (talk) 12:21, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Article needs work
I read this article and looked at the Lionbridge web page. This article seems more like a plug for the companies services than encyclopedic content. It needs major revisions. I question the Neutrality of the article.