Jump to content

Talk:Drug classification: making a hash of it?: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 5: Line 5:
== I want science, not prejudices. ==
== I want science, not prejudices. ==


I think it is completely ridiculous that our drug policy isn't based on science. This is comparable to the theory of evolution being replaced by creationism. Of course the theory of evolution should be educated to kids, not creationism, and of course our drug policy should be based on science, not prejudices.--[[Special:Contributions/158.39.240.107|158.39.240.107]] ([[User talk:158.39.240.107|talk]]) 20:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
I think it is completely ridiculous that our drug policy isn't based on science. This is comparable to the theory of evolution being replaced by creationism. Of course the theory of evolution should be taught to kids, not creationism, and of course our drug policy should be based on science, not prejudices.--[[Special:Contributions/158.39.240.107|158.39.240.107]] ([[User talk:158.39.240.107|talk]]) 20:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:25, 28 March 2009

WikiProject iconDrug Policy (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Drug Policy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Is this notable enough for its own article? Did it get alot of press in the UK, in which case some popular feedback from the press would be important if not essential to show this. Otherwise should be merged into drug policy as an interesting episode I guess. Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:50, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I want science, not prejudices.

I think it is completely ridiculous that our drug policy isn't based on science. This is comparable to the theory of evolution being replaced by creationism. Of course the theory of evolution should be taught to kids, not creationism, and of course our drug policy should be based on science, not prejudices.--158.39.240.107 (talk) 20:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]