User talk:12.187.93.246: Difference between revisions
sharedip |
→Re: Claim to have just reverted 3 acts of vandalism: realizing assumption of bad faith |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
No you didn't. We can see the complete history of everything you've done. [[User:DanielDeibler|DanielDeibler]] ([[User talk:DanielDeibler|talk]]) 02:56, 2 April 2009 (UTC) |
No you didn't. We can see the complete history of everything you've done. [[User:DanielDeibler|DanielDeibler]] ([[User talk:DanielDeibler|talk]]) 02:56, 2 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
:What part of "We can see the complete history of everything you've done" do you not fully understand? See: [[Special:Contributions/12.187.93.246|Everything you've done on Wikipedia]] to see that you had only constructively edited one article at the time of your original claim and that the vandalism you claimed to revert containing "Connor wood sucks cock." is not listed and most likely was your attempt of vandalizing [[User:Belasted|Belasted's]] [[User_talk:Belasted|user talk page]] while claiming to do the opposite. [[User:DanielDeibler|DanielDeibler]] ([[User talk:DanielDeibler|talk]]) 03:10, 2 April 2009 (UTC) |
:What part of "We can see the complete history of everything you've done" do you not fully understand? See: [[Special:Contributions/12.187.93.246|Everything you've done on Wikipedia]] to see that you had only constructively edited one article at the time of your original claim and that the vandalism you claimed to revert containing "Connor wood sucks cock." is not listed and most likely was your attempt of vandalizing [[User:Belasted|Belasted's]] [[User_talk:Belasted|user talk page]] while claiming to do the opposite. [[User:DanielDeibler|DanielDeibler]] ([[User talk:DanielDeibler|talk]]) 03:10, 2 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
::I was just thinking about this comment and realize that it is [[WP:FAITH|assuming bad faith]], which I shouldn't do. There are "reformed vandals" and I should have assumed that you had genuinely decided to start being constructive since that is what you said you were doing. Not seeing the constructive edits you claimed to make was not a good enough reason to assume bad faith and I apologize for doing so. In the future, I will think about incidents like this much more carefully before commenting or acting. I am leaving my original comments because I don't want to give the false impression that I am trying to hide my mistake. If you want to remove them, you have my blessing. [[User:DanielDeibler|DanielDeibler]] ([[User talk:DanielDeibler|talk]]) 18:07, 4 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:07, 4 April 2009
 Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.  Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Conan O'Brien, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Belasted (talk) 03:08, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
April 2009
Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User:Belasted. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Belasted (talk) 02:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:12.187.93.246. DanielDeibler (talk) 02:35, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:44, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
So...
In other words, you think I'm retarded? I guarantee you will find much more entertainment in constructive editing than you will in this pointless vandalism which will only lead to you getting blocked. I usually don't even dignify your kind with a response, but seeing as how it's April Fool's day, I'll be friendly to a fool for once. PS. If you want to be constructive, you might as well create an account Belasted (talk) 02:51, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: Claim to have just reverted 3 acts of vandalism
No you didn't. We can see the complete history of everything you've done. DanielDeibler (talk) 02:56, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- What part of "We can see the complete history of everything you've done" do you not fully understand? See: Everything you've done on Wikipedia to see that you had only constructively edited one article at the time of your original claim and that the vandalism you claimed to revert containing "Connor wood sucks cock." is not listed and most likely was your attempt of vandalizing Belasted's user talk page while claiming to do the opposite. DanielDeibler (talk) 03:10, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- I was just thinking about this comment and realize that it is assuming bad faith, which I shouldn't do. There are "reformed vandals" and I should have assumed that you had genuinely decided to start being constructive since that is what you said you were doing. Not seeing the constructive edits you claimed to make was not a good enough reason to assume bad faith and I apologize for doing so. In the future, I will think about incidents like this much more carefully before commenting or acting. I am leaving my original comments because I don't want to give the false impression that I am trying to hide my mistake. If you want to remove them, you have my blessing. DanielDeibler (talk) 18:07, 4 April 2009 (UTC)