User talk:KuroiShiroi: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:KuroiShiroi/Archive 1.
Line 43: Line 43:


:I did leave it alone. I merely asked that you provide better references and moved the page to the proper location. I haven't voted for the page's deletion and I have not yet inspired your ire, so I would prefer that you avoid speaking of me in such a manner. [[User talk:KuroiShiroi|KuroiShiroi]] ([[Special:Contributions/KuroiShiroi|contribs]]) 18:00, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
:I did leave it alone. I merely asked that you provide better references and moved the page to the proper location. I haven't voted for the page's deletion and I have not yet inspired your ire, so I would prefer that you avoid speaking of me in such a manner. [[User talk:KuroiShiroi|KuroiShiroi]] ([[Special:Contributions/KuroiShiroi|contribs]]) 18:00, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

== Temporary injunction and your use of my monobook script ==

Hi KuroiShiroi,

I am pleased to see that you have used my monobook script to remove the autoformatting or linking of dates or other functions; I hope you have found it useful.

This is to let you know that ArbCom has announced a temporary injunction against the "mass delinking of dates". You can still delink dates on an occasional basis; however, you may wish to be cautious and use the script only for its non-date functions until the issue is resolved by an RFC poll. You may wish to express your view on autoformatting and date linking in the RFC at: [[Wikipedia:Date_formatting_and_linking_poll]].

Regards [[User:Lightmouse|Lightmouse]] ([[User talk:Lightmouse|talk]]) 19:05, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:05, 5 April 2009

Matt Barrass

I have reverted your move, as there are two footballers called Matt Barrass - one born 1899, and his great-grandson born in 1980. Please dicsuss page moves in future. Regards, GiantSnowman 04:07, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, didn't know the existence of those two. KuroiShiroi (talk) 04:08, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, it happens to the best of us! As a rule of thumb, it's better to discuss page moves on an article's talk page, to stop things like this happening in future. GiantSnowman 04:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
See, I was patrolling newpages, so most of the time, I get pages where the names are improper because the user is unaware of naming convention. Of course, you're not a new user in the slightest, which is something I will be checking for in the future. Again, sorry for the trouble. KuroiShiroi (talk) 04:22, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Don't apologise - seriously, it was no effort to correct. Hope the patrolling goes well in future! Thanks, GiantSnowman 04:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your removal of {{db-person}} for Johan Fridlund

Hello KuroiShiroi and welcome to Wikipedia. You removed the speedy-delete I added earlier today for Johan Fridlund, claiming that this 16 year-old passes WP:ATHLETE. I've reviewed WP:ATHLETE (again) and can't find a thread of justification for your claim. Would you write a few words below in support of it? Thanks, Jim Ward (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I see it, he is a member of Ängelholms FF, a "second tier" team. That would, I assume, be a "pully professional level of a sport", though I may be mistaken as I do not know Swedish football very well. Correct me if I'm wrong, and feel free to AfD him. I just don't see how he is a speedy though. KuroiShiroi (talk) 05:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There seems to be a move afoot by some young Swedish footballers to establish articles about themselves and their friends on Wikipedia. Ponge1992 is one such individual and the author of this article, as well as one about himself. The subject at issue, Mr. Fridlund, is 16 years old, a fact born out by the article. This prima facie gives rise to the question, is it even possible that this individual is established at the fully professional level of the sport, as required by WP:ATHLETE? I'd wager not, but I'd be happy -- save for some disappointment with a culture that supports such a thing -- to be proven wrong. I'll AfD the article. Regards & thanks, Jim Ward (talk) 05:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have no prejudice to such a motion. I'll bet it actually gets deleted too. Speedies though, do take a bit of specific criteria, and if the tagged person has even the slightest chance of passing Notability, he cannot be deleted via speedy. Sorry for the trouble. Oh, and I definitely agree on the obvious COI creations, but there's not much we can do about it. KuroiShiroi (talk) 05:39, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hi - I've fullfilled your request. Please remember to take a look at WP:RBK to fully understand when to use the tool. Thanks. Pedro :  Chat  07:48, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will read that document before beginning to use rollback. KuroiShiroi (talk) 12:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, KuroiShiroi. You have new messages at Ged UK's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--GedUK  18:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Melanie Scalera

PLease do not delete my page... I am trying to expand it, if someone does not know Melanie Scalera they do not have a right to say she is not a noteable person! How rude! I have a friend who has a page on here and has done way less movies than her! Page on Melanie Scalera

Um, I think I know who I am and have been in films, major and local and am pretty much well known in my state. It is really rude and predjuced for you to assume that I an a nobody you are probably from some other country, how could you possibly know what goes on about Rhode Island. Edit things and put in your 2 cents about things you actually know about! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.200.180.60 (talk) 07:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I can get over 1,000 people on here to sign a petition verifying that Miss Melanie Scalera is pretty well known around here in this community! There is just no reason why these so called 'editors' should act like they know things they do not. If you don't know, then leave it alone!--Mellrocks (talk) 07:49, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did leave it alone. I merely asked that you provide better references and moved the page to the proper location. I haven't voted for the page's deletion and I have not yet inspired your ire, so I would prefer that you avoid speaking of me in such a manner. KuroiShiroi (contribs) 18:00, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary injunction and your use of my monobook script

Hi KuroiShiroi,

I am pleased to see that you have used my monobook script to remove the autoformatting or linking of dates or other functions; I hope you have found it useful.

This is to let you know that ArbCom has announced a temporary injunction against the "mass delinking of dates". You can still delink dates on an occasional basis; however, you may wish to be cautious and use the script only for its non-date functions until the issue is resolved by an RFC poll. You may wish to express your view on autoformatting and date linking in the RFC at: Wikipedia:Date_formatting_and_linking_poll.

Regards Lightmouse (talk) 19:05, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]