User talk:MLauba

Me	My Talk Page	My Contributions

Internship International

Hey,

you deleted my page internship - international.com. Is this possible that this page disappears totally and I may start again with Internship-international.com? What do you want me to change? The page Internship International is made for a good cause and is very informative and helpful for internship seekers and interns. In this way it meets the requirements of wikipedia. What can I do/ What do you want me to do for me to be able to launch the page?

Greetings

Daniel —Preceding unsigned comment added by Intern71 (talk • contribs) 15:57, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

I actually haven't deleted any pages, I don't have the power to do that. What I did is nominate it for further review and speedy deletion. To keep it short, wikipedia requires any new article to meet a certain amount of inclusion criteriae, the most important being that its content can be verified through several independent and reliable third-party sources. In other words, that the topic of the article has been commented upon by other people (and blogs or an organisation's own website for instance don't qualify). These sources have to be included in the article. The whole process is summed up in the General Notability Guideline. Also be aware that Notability in the wikipedian sense doesn't mean that something has to be important, but rather that any topic has been noted and commented upon by others. Last but not least, an article must be written using a neutral style and not read like an advertisement (there are private websites for the latter). I suggest you take some time reading the different tutorials and reviewing the policies and guidelines I have linked in this reply, this will give you the means to write an article which will stand the challenge of a review. Hope that helps. MLauba (talk) 21:17, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Palkiewicz

FYI - I removed the Possible Copyvio tag you placed on Palkiewicz after removing the offending text. After removing it I found another CSD copyvio on his website, so I replace the CSD updated to reflect the new site. ttonyb1 (talk) 16:31, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

No problems, I had initially tagged CSD myself but realized that only half of the article was a visible violation so went for the "safer" way instead. Looks like my initial instinct was correct after all :). MLauba (talk) 16:32, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

8-) ttonyb1 (talk) 16:34, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

More info. Great speedy tagging work this morning! - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 17:15, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Doubt 2 days would have changed anything but will bear this in mind for the future, thanks. MLauba (talk) 17:17, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

"Linderdaum Engine" copyright

Greetings,

i have sent a copyright permission confirmation to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org concerning citation of http://www.linderdaum.com/home/index.php?title=Features

What i have to do to unlock the article "Linderdaum Engine" ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Corporateshark (talk • contribs) 20:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

At this stage, just wait until an Admin reviews the matter and lifts the copyvio tag. In the meantime, you can go back to the page and follow the link and instructions given to create a subpage and edit that one. Your original contribution can still be copied from the edit box on the article's main page. That being said, I highly suggest changing the content to a prose description rather than a full feature list as it is right now, the full list is available at the Linderdaum page for people who want to read about it. Explain the core functions of the software instead, it will render the article encyclopedic. MLauba (talk) 20:57, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

I see no evidence that the article has ever been "locked". But what you have to do to make the article stick is: make the engine notable. Wait until people start using it and independent reviews of the engine are created. Soon after that, someone with no COI will write here about the engine. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:05, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

I believe what Coporateshark was refering to was the fact that the copyvio tag replaces the article content and requests you not to touch the article page in its present form, not a physical lock. MLauba (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

rage quit

Please contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 April 7#Rage quit → Multiplayer video game. Uncle G (talk) 12:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Gladstone Education

Hi

You have requested speedy deletion of my page but I am the writer and author of the copy from the original source.

Please desist.

Thanks

JBlomfield

(Jblomfield (talk) 11:38, 9 April 2009 (UTC))

This requires admin intervention. However, since you claim ownership of the material, this is no longer a speedy deletion case, I will therefore change the classification. Please do follow the instructions provided on the page after the change in order to get your content approved. MLauba (talk) 11:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about the comment

You sent me some warnings about comments ive ben putting on pages, and im sorry.