User talk:202.92.40.8

Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (202.92.40.8) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -- Levine2112 ^discuss 01:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Strip search prank call scam has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Will ^(talk) 02:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

yeah?? so you think that do you Will ? Sceptre, here is who you are . "Hello, I'm Will. I'm 17 years old." Well there we go, who the hell do you think you are. You are a clearly very unpopular revert goon,because everyone goes to your talk page to tell you that, so you have it "semi protected". well, you clearly need protection, because you are just a revert goon.

Rervert Goon

How do you know if you are a revert goon ? Do you consider how many points you get for reverts ? Do you look to increase your revert count ? do you compare notes with other revert goons ? Do you study any improvement of a page, no matter how much better that edit is, to find the slightest defect (or more usually, just to satisfy yourself that there *might* be a defect that could possibly fly. actually hang on, most revert goons just pick a random fault to assign ...) Do you have your own "talk page" protected  ? Do you post bombastic comments on other peoples talk pages, such as "I deem you unworthy". If so, then maybe you are a revert goon.

202.92.40.8 (talk) 10:12, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Jury

It was written too simplistically and polemically, thereby lacking a neutral tone. Trying to insult will hardly help you advance your argument. Thx. El_C 02:49, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

For example: In criminal trials, Members of the jury are being asked to find if not only is the person guilty , guiltly by action and guilty by morality, but also whether the law is able to be interpreted and applied to give the result that the accused is guilty. That is grammatically awkward, is a convoluted passage, with idiosyncratic punctuation, misspelling, double-negatives, uppercase after a comma, extra spaces, etc. It's not good writing, and yes, I have written many articles here (a few hundred), although, admittedly, none in the last day or two. Hope this helps you in some way. Thanks again. El_C 02:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Blocked for 31 hrs for harrassing users

As you chose to go harrass El C and CaptainPanda on their talk pages, your IP address has been blocked from editing for 31 hours.

Please don't harrass or bother our editors and administrators. Wikipedia has policies on civility of behavior while editing, avoiding personal attacks, and we ask that people behave in a generally decent manner. Please try to keep this in mind when your block expires. Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 03:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

George, why did you come here to tell such lies ????? 202.92.40.8 (talk) 10:18, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

No answer. If he refused to answer in all this time, I can only assume he was lying and has no reason for it. 06:17, 21 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.92.33.210 (talk)

About your edit summary here

Hi, 202.92.40.8. There is a time and a place for me to tell people I think are idiots that they are idiots, to tell people who couldn't write an decent sentence to save their lives that they couldn't write an decent sentence to save their lives, and to acidly ridicule people I think are idiots and/or couldn't write an decent sentence to save their lives. Whether I like it or not, editing Wikipedia is not that time or that place, not even in edit summaries. --Shirt58 (talk) 10:27, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
ps: click on my contributions to see that I am most definitely no civility saint - it's a history of bad edits, bad edit summaries, and worse.

---

All that about the phrase "pig latin" in the edit summary.

Did I ridicule you ? i just expanded the sentence into less complex paragraph (a couple of sentences), which is hardly different to yours. I was exagerating in the revert summary. didnt mean to offend.

"see that I am most definitely no civility saint - it's a history of bad edits, bad edit summaries, and worse." Pointless self deprecation. Whats the point of arriving in court and saying "I am often guilty of speeding, but not in this case"??

202.92.40.8 (talk) 10:35, 19 April 2008 (UTC)