Talk:Chuck: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:21, 1 May 2009

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Removing "People"?

It seems to me that this long list of people whose first name is "Chuck" should be removed from this disambig. Such "named" folks can be found easily enough with a search, and an article on "Chuck" should contain people or things that are referred to as chuck and chuck alone, since Wikipedia is not a directory and disambiguation pages are not search indices. Any thoughts? I'll give it a week, and if nobody objects, trim the page. ◉ ghoti 18:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, done. Please see WP:D#Lists rationale. ◉ ghoti 14:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Chuck"... Norris?

Does anyone think that Chuck Norris should be mentioned on this page? I mean, isn't he sometimes referred to as just "Chuck"? I just wanted to make sure before I just put it on there. --Superpika66 (talk) 23:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Other Uses' removed?

Why? It had relevant info.

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Does anyone think that Chuck Norris should be mentioned on this page? I mean, isn't he sometimes referred to as just "Chuck"? I just wanted to make sure before I just put it on there. --[[User:Superpika66|Superpika66]] ([[User talk:Superpika66|talk]]) 23:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
+=='Other Uses' removed?==
+Why? It had relevant info.