Talk:Chuck: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Does anyone think that Chuck Norris should be mentioned on this page? I mean, isn't he sometimes referred to as just "Chuck"? I just wanted to make sure before I just put it on there. --[[User:Superpika66|Superpika66]] ([[User talk:Superpika66|talk]]) 23:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
Does anyone think that Chuck Norris should be mentioned on this page? I mean, isn't he sometimes referred to as just "Chuck"? I just wanted to make sure before I just put it on there. --[[User:Superpika66|Superpika66]] ([[User talk:Superpika66|talk]]) 23:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
=='Other Uses' removed?== |
|||
Why? It had relevant info. |
Revision as of 15:21, 1 May 2009
Anthroponymy Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Removing "People"?
It seems to me that this long list of people whose first name is "Chuck" should be removed from this disambig. Such "named" folks can be found easily enough with a search, and an article on "Chuck" should contain people or things that are referred to as chuck and chuck alone, since Wikipedia is not a directory and disambiguation pages are not search indices. Any thoughts? I'll give it a week, and if nobody objects, trim the page. ◉ ghoti 18:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, done. Please see WP:D#Lists rationale. ◉ ghoti 14:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
"Chuck"... Norris?
Does anyone think that Chuck Norris should be mentioned on this page? I mean, isn't he sometimes referred to as just "Chuck"? I just wanted to make sure before I just put it on there. --Superpika66 (talk) 23:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)