User talk:Backslashcite: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:52, 7 May 2009

I completely disagree with your analysis of this important issue. The information is sourced and well attested. If you have factual problems then please do list them, otherwise could you please leave the text where it is.80.200.62.116 (talk) 12:55, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are User:Cocoaverification, since you seem to be responding to this. Could you please log in next time when you leave a comment here?

I already gave you the reasons why I reverted your edits: They violate NPOV, the sources you gave are worthless (I'm sorry, but they are. I read the articles you linked to, and they don't mention Kraft or Côte_d'Or even once), and the criticism section is out of proportion for such a short article.

You did not address a single one of those points, and just put the paragraph back in. I just took it out again, but since we seem to go into a loop here, I requested assistance in this dispute here

- Minvogt (talk) 17:38, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 :- [[User:Minvogt|Minvogt]] ([[User talk:Minvogt#top|talk]]) 17:38, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
-== May 2009 ==
-[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please do not add [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|unsourced]] or [[Wikipedia:No original research|original content]]{{#if:Côte d'Or (brand)|, as you did to [[:Côte d'Or (brand)]]}}. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability policy]]. If you continue to do so, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-unsourced3 --> ''Also, please note that it is not permitted to cite Wikipedia as a source; we require third-party [[WP:RS|reliable sources]].'' [[User_talk:Spidern|<font color="darkred">←</font>]]<font color="green">[[User:Spidern|Spidern]]</font>[[Special:Contributions/Spidern|<font color="darkblue">→</font>]] 18:46, 7 May 2009 (UTC)