Talk:Elaine Benes

Personality

How come there is no section about Elaine's personality? It's just a list of facts about her otherwise.

frickin hilarious how long this article is, especially compared to the actresses real life page:p —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.175.1.253 (talk) 19:20, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Parallelism

We should try to make the articles on Cosmo Kramer, George Costanza, and Elaine Benes parallel.

Yeah. I especially like the personality flaws section of George Costanza's

---

For comparison, Jerry and George attended Queens College

i thought jerry went to nyu (the nyu woman interviews him in the "not that there's anything wrong with that" episode for an alumni magazine...) --24.181.228.103 02:05, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

This is not true. The paper in "The Outing" was only identified as "the NYU paper". Jerry went to Queens College (as did George), as revealed in "The Marine Biologist". --Satyricrash 09:49, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Horrible Picture

The picture at the top of this article is one of the worst I've seen. It needs to go.

I totally agree! It looks like it is really distorted. HORRIBLE! T. White 08:10, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

I adjusted the size of the picture so that it is not so distorted. If anyone has any further objections to this picture . . . maybe we should find another one? T. White 08:14, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Inconsistencies

In the sectiong titled Inconsistencies, it lists that Elaine considered herself a pesco-vegetarian but later revealed that she likes duck and other kinds of meat. Pesco-vegetarians are those vegetarians who refrain from eating certain types of meat but who may partake of other types. This really doesn't seem like an inconsistency to me due to the fact that she may like fowl and such but may not have eaten other types of meat. I'm deleting this sentence. T. White 08:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm removing this section. After reading the entire list of "so called" inconsistencies I do not see where the reasoning is behind them. If you feel that they should be included, justify the reasoning. For instance, the sentence relating to the English Patient doesn't make sense because I do not see how it is a legitimate inconsistency and also in reference to her crying at the translation of the korean ladies being inconsistent with her character - there were several times that she was notably upset. Not just this time. When she was fired by Mr. Pitt, she cried as well. T. White 08:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Fat vs Thin

To the person,who decided to delete almost half of the entire article without any discussion first: A lot of articles about TV characters discuss interesting trivia about their lives. Seinfeld in particular is a show that deals with a lot of trivia and maybe there could be discussion first about what you think is unnecessarily information. For example, dating is a huge part of Seinfeld, so discussing Elaine's other boyfriends as well as Jerry's girlfriends is in fact pertinent as they are part of her relationships in her life. thanks. --Mezaco 20:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

It's been discussed to bits here, here, here, here, here and here.

The fact that a show has often been referred to (courtesy of Larry David) as a "show about nothing" does not justify an article about nothing.

There are some shows that merit lists on Wikipedia. An obvious one is The List (My Name Is Earl) as it's the premise of the show. As mentioned here, List of men, women and children enchanted by Elaine Benes or List of soubriquets applied (in passing, in jest, blink and you'll miss 'em) to Elaine Benes clearly don't fall into that category.

chocolateboy 20:06, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

The Elaine Benes article.

I've always known what a good article is. I thought everyone has follow the rules and improve the article. Recently the ChocolateBoy decided its a good idea that the only contribution is Elaine's boyfriends Jerry Seinfeld and David Puddy. Although I'm still new to this, hopefully everyone should keep an eye out for ChocolateBoy. I have question his "idea" of improving the article. The idea is not to be perfect with every web page but to be creative in each page. If nothing positive has come out of ChocolateBoy than answer this question? How can I be friends with you with such negative traits? I'll be thankful that no-one has to be perfect and that's the way it suppose to be. I know I shouldn't be personal but its a question of principle.

Chocolateboy, I'm hoping you can sway me with something good instead. You helped me out, I'm straighting you out.

(Johnnyauau2000 06:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC))

Characteristics

The reason I added that 'cause compare to George, Jerry and Kramer, I don't know anything about Elaine. I would appreciate if they know how to shape up the important things in Elaine's different sides. It would be also helpful if you try not to rule out too many possibilities that would've been useful later on if anyone has a feeling that something is still missing. A bonus if they add at least 1 cite or in plain English, a website reference. Please? Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 03:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

RfC: Are hairstyle changes noteworthy

Is the description of hairstyle changes in the "Characteristics" section noteworthy to the article? To answer your question, yes because if you only talk about how she act, you only look at it from one side. Even in Kramer's article, there's nothing wrong about adding fashion and hairstyle to the character. It's now 2008 and I do get the sense of political correctness in this time of day. If hairstyle was an issue, than it would've been banned to not to mention any sign of hair and it will leave editors wandering "What's missing in this article?". You must remember the audience you are aiming for. Not for your personal pleasure. If you want to talk to me or Gprince007, you can talk directly in "my talk" or go to WikiProject Seinfeld, sign yourself and put it on the discussion page. I've already had edit wars and if you push to cut out anymore info, especially important info that'll help in the future, than you better have a good reason why you want to do that. Little issues like this shouldn't be a big deal under any circumstances no matter how correct you are. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 11:16, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Kramer's and George's hairstyles are part of their character. The description of Elaine's hairstyle is just that--a description of how she wore her hair; it adds nothing to the character. In fact, the description makes reference to dialogue about her hair in just four episodes out of 180--hardly worth mentioning.

If you want to keep the hairstyle section in, at least rewrite it so it makes actual sense. Here is how the section reads now:

Her hairstyle went through changes over the years, though for the majority of the series whether the style was long, with curls or with waves. Notable deviations from this were mentioned in the season 8 episode "The Soul Mate", in which Elaine refers to the straightened hairstyle she suddenly had in the final two episodes ("The Wait Out" and "The Invitations") of season 7, and then decides to go to an extremely short hairstyle by the end of the episode, only to regret the decision when it is met with apprehension by Jerry. Her hairstyle returned to longer than shoulder length by season 8 "The Summer of George" to season 9 "The Betrayal" as well as "The Strike" in which her hair is affected by steam. In "The Movie", George describes Elaine as "pretty," but having a "big wall of hair" and a "face like a frying pan".

I would suggest making the following changes:

Her hairstyle went through changes over the years, though for the majority of the series the style was long with curls or waves. Notable deviations from this were mentioned in the season 8 episode The Soul Mate, in which Elaine refers to the straightened hairstyle she suddenly wears. In the final two episodes of season 7 (The Wait Out and The Invitations), Elaine wears an extremely short hairstyle only to regret the change when it is met with apprehension by Jerry. Her hairstyle returned to shoulder length by season 8 in The Summer of George. In the Season 9 episode The Strike, Elaine's hair is damaged when affected by steam.

Sottolacqua (talk) 12:58, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

RFC comment. Yes, where a characters hairstyle becomes a plot point (or influences real-world fashion trends) it is notable. The text could just focus on the notable deviations. --Davémon (talk) 21:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

I do not mean to be mean in my last comment undoing Johnnyauau2000's revision but given that even mentioning her hair at all is pushing the bounds, I don't think that the status of her hair as messy or well-kept in certain episodes really has much to do with giving a user of this encyclopedia a good idea of the character. Specific info about her hair is better for fansites. I love the show and character, and love the little details from it, but it just doesn't read right to me as a Wikipedia article. Matches10 (talk) 18:40, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

There is still a few more things to clear up.

If anyone is done with the hair issue I like to move on. I'm curious about Newman having a crush on Elaine. I don't think just having one line satisfy me. If you have like evidence or suggestions please put it in since I'm being open minded about it. The other issue I found that is the least talked about is Elaine being one of the boys. I always wonder "What does that mean? Is she always hanging out with girls or is she comfortable being playful around boys?" If she is one of the boys, how can you tell? Like the first one, I like to have anything that can help me with my curiousity. Lastly, how do I put those ideas into this article? I'll be glad if anyone is reading my message.

You can answer me anytime in my talk and hopefully they won't make a big deal over it. By the way, what's a maternity leave? Let me know. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 05:06, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Elaine not Jewish

Wasn't there an episode where Kramer is running a Jewish dating service? If I recall correctly, he hands a flier to Elaine, who tells him she's not interested because "I'm not Jewish." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.200.118.1 (talk) 19:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, and Kramer replies that neither is he, but he loves the food, IIRC. There also was one episode where George explicitly claimed she was a shiksa, if my memory not fails. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 23:24, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Real Life Inspiration

The article lists three sources of inspriation for the character; Leifer, Yates and McNabb. The lead only mentions Leifer, though she is excluded from the info box and the section on Real life inspriation says suggestions that the character was based on her were refuted. I didn't know about McNabb but if it is in the Bio then okay, there are sources out there which refer to Yates as the inspiration, and i would assume some for Leifer as well. I would think all three shaped the character but given that the whole thing isn't clear and poorly cited and that its hard to assess the extent to which each inspired the character, maybe listing inspiration in info box or the lead should be avoided and discussion confined to the one section of the article. It currently comes across as greatly confused.