Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PeepLaukFlyingWing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Flyingthing (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Well, even non-successful flying wings are notable in aviation history. Considering the 11 year effort and excellent craftmanship it really deserves to be listed. <font color="green">[[User:Flyingthing|Flyingthing]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Flyingthing|ChatMe!]]</sup> |
Well, even non-successful flying wings are notable in aviation history. Considering the 11 year effort and excellent craftmanship it really deserves to be listed. <font color="green">[[User:Flyingthing|Flyingthing]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Flyingthing|ChatMe!]]</sup> |
||
: '''Comment''' Many people spend long years creating wonderful pieces of craftwork for their own enjoyment. This does not make such efforts notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. <font color="green">[[User:WikiDan61|WikiDan61]]</font><font color="green" size="5px"></font><sup>[[User talk:WikiDan61|ChatMe!]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/WikiDan61|ReadMe!!]]</sub> 18:31, 13 May 2009 (UTC) |
: '''Comment''' Many people spend long years creating wonderful pieces of craftwork for their own enjoyment. This does not make such efforts notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. <font color="green">[[User:WikiDan61|WikiDan61]]</font><font color="green" size="5px"></font><sup>[[User talk:WikiDan61|ChatMe!]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/WikiDan61|ReadMe!!]]</sub> 18:31, 13 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
: '''Comment''' Well, could you then pass here some links to post WWII flying wing glider ? .. of comparable parameters ? Or twin-engine motorglider ? Or competition class flying wing glider ? I might agree that maybe it is too early to make it public. <font color="green">[[User:Flyingthing|Flyingthing]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Flyingthing|ChatMe!]]</sup> |
|||
Revision as of 18:45, 13 May 2009
PeepLaukFlyingWing
- PeepLaukFlyingWing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable home-built project. Project has not yet even achieved success. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:33, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Well, even non-successful flying wings are notable in aviation history. Considering the 11 year effort and excellent craftmanship it really deserves to be listed. FlyingthingChatMe!
- Comment Many people spend long years creating wonderful pieces of craftwork for their own enjoyment. This does not make such efforts notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:31, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Well, could you then pass here some links to post WWII flying wing glider ? .. of comparable parameters ? Or twin-engine motorglider ? Or competition class flying wing glider ? I might agree that maybe it is too early to make it public. FlyingthingChatMe!