Talk:Transgenderism (social movement): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:41, 18 May 2009

	LGBTQ portal This redirect is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Postgenderism advanced enough?

Does anyone else think that the postgenderism warrants its own article? Its goals and broader philosophy far exceeds the concerns of common Transgenderism after all. Fetternity (talk) 05:10, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Postgenderism already had its own article but it was being threatenec with deletion so we merged the content of that article into the Transgenderism article. --Loremaster (talk) 14:39, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's a terrible solution though. These two things are not even related. If postgenderism needs to be deleted, that doesn't mean it should just take over a completely different article that coincidentally shares the same word. I suggest splitting these again. 24.5.174.153 (talk) 23:38, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As the article explains, transgenderism is also a synonym for postgenderism so they are related. Therefore, I'm opposed to a split until the word gains more currency. --Loremaster (talk)

Postgenderism most definitely is not a synonym for transgenderism. Postgenderism is a serious topic of discussion amongst gender theory circles. I think it deserves its own article. ronnycary (talk) 16:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 00:19, 18 May 2009 edit Loremaster (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 55,183 edits →Postgenderism advanced enough? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:41, 18 May 2009 edit undo Rondmc170 (talk \| contribs) 61 edits →Postgenderism advanced enough? Next edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:::As the article explains, transgenderism is also a synonym for postgenderism so they are related. Therefore, I'm opposed to a split until the word gains more currency. --[[User:Loremaster\|Loremaster]] ([[User talk:Loremaster\|talk]])		:::As the article explains, transgenderism is also a synonym for postgenderism so they are related. Therefore, I'm opposed to a split until the word gains more currency. --[[User:Loremaster\|Loremaster]] ([[User talk:Loremaster\|talk]])

			::::Postgenderism most definitely is not a synonym for transgenderism. Postgenderism is a serious topic of discussion amongst gender theory circles. I think it deserves its own article. [[User:Rondmc170\|ronnycary]] ([[User talk:Rondmc170\|talk]]) 16:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)