Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 June 2: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
* '''Keep''': It's perfectly valid fair use, is tiny low res, is the only picture for the section. If the section itself is justified, then so is a picture. <tt>[[User:badmonkey|<font color="#33333">bad</font>'''·<font color="#66666">monkey</font>''']]</tt> <sub><font color="#AAAAA"><small>talk to the</small></font> '''[[User_talk:badmonkey|{:()]]'''</sub> ''' <small>::</small> ''' 04:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC) |
* '''Keep''': It's perfectly valid fair use, is tiny low res, is the only picture for the section. If the section itself is justified, then so is a picture. <tt>[[User:badmonkey|<font color="#33333">bad</font>'''·<font color="#66666">monkey</font>''']]</tt> <sub><font color="#AAAAA"><small>talk to the</small></font> '''[[User_talk:badmonkey|{:()]]'''</sub> ''' <small>::</small> ''' 04:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
* '''Comment''': While I am the uploader of this version, I was simply resizing the picture. Proper notification should be given to the original uploader of the image in order to allow them to state their case. --[[User:Fuzzy510|fuzzy510]] ([[User talk:Fuzzy510|talk]]) 04:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC) |
* '''Comment''': While I am the uploader of this version, I was simply resizing the picture. Proper notification should be given to the original uploader of the image in order to allow them to state their case. --[[User:Fuzzy510|fuzzy510]] ([[User talk:Fuzzy510|talk]]) 04:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
* '''Keep''': It's perfectly valid fair use, it shows the "blister" detail where the changed nose gear will go in this variant, and it is therefore helpful. [[User:Rtgrant5|Rtgrant5]] ([[User talk:Rtgrant5|talk]]) 10:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:38, 2 June 2009
June 2
- NFCC2. Associated Press image with no discussion in article of image itself. ViperSnake151 Talk 01:18, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- NFCC2 violation. Press images cannot be used to illustrate the subject of the article unless the image itself is an iconic image of its subject. ViperSnake151 Talk 01:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep: NFCC2 says only, "Non-free content is not used in a manner that is likely to replace the original market role of the original copyrighted media." This greatly-reduced 172x270 jpeg certainly does not diminish the commercial value of the hi-res. original. A search for a free image, including Flickr, found nothing. As the person is dead, it is of course impossible to create a free image. Therefore, NFCC is fully met in all respects, even using the most stringent application of our policies and guidelines. JGHowes talk 02:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- I Agree partially with both of you. She is dead and as such we cannot create a free image any more. What we can do though is either use a non-press image (of which there are lots and lots) or ask one of the flickr users (like this) if they will release their image under a free licence. While a free image may be difficult, a non-press one is not - Peripitus (Talk) 03:27, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Mutley1412 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Non-free image used to illustrate that a sportsperson as a child once. Image adds nothing of significance to the article (fails WP:NFCC#8) and the sourcing (with the lack of a copyright holder) is lacking Peripitus (Talk) 02:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Non-free image of a living person. Clearly replaceable with a new free image - fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 02:46, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- There is no need for a image of this image in the Airbus A330. Although this model is not constructed yet, there are several other similar images in the article. Important differences can be discussed in the text. Rettetast (talk) 03:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- But what about an image of the image of the image?
- Keep: It's perfectly valid fair use, is tiny low res, is the only picture for the section. If the section itself is justified, then so is a picture. bad·monkey talk to the {:() :: 04:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: While I am the uploader of this version, I was simply resizing the picture. Proper notification should be given to the original uploader of the image in order to allow them to state their case. --fuzzy510 (talk) 04:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep: It's perfectly valid fair use, it shows the "blister" detail where the changed nose gear will go in this variant, and it is therefore helpful. Rtgrant5 (talk) 10:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)