Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 June 2: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rtgrant5 (talk | contribs)
Line 31: Line 31:
* '''Keep''': It's perfectly valid fair use, is tiny low res, is the only picture for the section. If the section itself is justified, then so is a picture. <tt>[[User:badmonkey|<font color="#33333">bad</font>'''&middot;<font color="#66666">monkey</font>''']]</tt> <sub><font color="#AAAAA"><small>talk to the</small></font> '''[[User_talk:badmonkey|{:()]]'''</sub> ''' <small>::</small> ''' 04:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
* '''Keep''': It's perfectly valid fair use, is tiny low res, is the only picture for the section. If the section itself is justified, then so is a picture. <tt>[[User:badmonkey|<font color="#33333">bad</font>'''&middot;<font color="#66666">monkey</font>''']]</tt> <sub><font color="#AAAAA"><small>talk to the</small></font> '''[[User_talk:badmonkey|{:()]]'''</sub> ''' <small>::</small> ''' 04:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
* '''Comment''': While I am the uploader of this version, I was simply resizing the picture. Proper notification should be given to the original uploader of the image in order to allow them to state their case. --[[User:Fuzzy510|fuzzy510]] ([[User talk:Fuzzy510|talk]]) 04:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
* '''Comment''': While I am the uploader of this version, I was simply resizing the picture. Proper notification should be given to the original uploader of the image in order to allow them to state their case. --[[User:Fuzzy510|fuzzy510]] ([[User talk:Fuzzy510|talk]]) 04:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
* '''Keep''': It's perfectly valid fair use, it shows the "blister" detail where the changed nose gear will go in this variant, and it is therefore helpful. [[User:Rtgrant5|Rtgrant5]] ([[User talk:Rtgrant5|talk]]) 10:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:38, 2 June 2009

June 2

File:Walid bin Attash by Janet Hamlin.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sherurcij (notify | contribs).
File:Kay Yow.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JGHowes (notify | contribs).
  • NFCC2 violation. Press images cannot be used to illustrate the subject of the article unless the image itself is an iconic image of its subject. ViperSnake151  Talk  01:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: NFCC2 says only, "Non-free content is not used in a manner that is likely to replace the original market role of the original copyrighted media." This greatly-reduced 172x270 jpeg certainly does not diminish the commercial value of the hi-res. original. A search for a free image, including Flickr, found nothing. As the person is dead, it is of course impossible to create a free image. Therefore, NFCC is fully met in all respects, even using the most stringent application of our policies and guidelines.  JGHowes  talk 02:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I Agree partially with both of you. She is dead and as such we cannot create a free image any more. What we can do though is either use a non-press image (of which there are lots and lots) or ask one of the flickr users (like this) if they will release their image under a free licence. While a free image may be difficult, a non-press one is not - Peripitus (Talk) 03:27, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Dale thomas 3455.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mutley1412 (notify | contribs).
File:Melissa Chaty.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Brand109 (notify | contribs).
File:A330-200F.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fuzzy510 (notify | contribs).
But what about an image of the image of the image?
  • Keep: It's perfectly valid fair use, is tiny low res, is the only picture for the section. If the section itself is justified, then so is a picture. bad·monkey talk to the {:() :: 04:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: While I am the uploader of this version, I was simply resizing the picture. Proper notification should be given to the original uploader of the image in order to allow them to state their case. --fuzzy510 (talk) 04:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: It's perfectly valid fair use, it shows the "blister" detail where the changed nose gear will go in this variant, and it is therefore helpful. Rtgrant5 (talk) 10:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]