Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat O'Donnell: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
re |
m delete |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
*:'''Comment''' - No crystal balling, please. [[User:Snappy|Snappy]] ([[User talk:Snappy|talk]]) 10:02, 7 June 2009 (UTC) |
*:'''Comment''' - No crystal balling, please. [[User:Snappy|Snappy]] ([[User talk:Snappy|talk]]) 10:02, 7 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - completely non-notable. [[User:Canterbury Tail|<font color="Blue">'''Canterbury Tail'''</font>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|''<font color="Blue">talk</font>'']] 12:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - completely non-notable. [[User:Canterbury Tail|<font color="Blue">'''Canterbury Tail'''</font>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|''<font color="Blue">talk</font>'']] 12:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' per Canterbury Tail. --[[User:Kuzaar|Kuzaar]]<sup>-[[User talk:Kuzaar|T]]-[[Special:Contributions/Kuzaar|C]]-</sup> 12:30, 10 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:30, 10 June 2009
Pat O'Donnell
AfDs for this article:
- Pat O'Donnell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Page Created for soapboxing purposes GainLine ♠ ♥ 08:17, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, otherwise NN. JBsupreme (talk) 09:03, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comment, if its for "soapboxing" then I suggest WP:FIXIT not delete it. What is the rationale behind deletion, is it based on notability, unreliable sources etc? I remain unconvinced because I dont hear a reason to actually delete it.--Vintagekits (talk) 10:05, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- I've nominated this as per advice by mediator at Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-05-6/Corrib Gas. Ths article is being used to soapbox and is not notable G
ainLine ♠ ♥ 10:55, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete There is coverage in reliable sources but I think that this is only temporary notability and that this falls under WP:NOTNEWS. If there is anything that should be included it should be merged into Shell to Sea rather than being in a separate article. Smartse (talk) 10:44, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. —G
ainLine ♠ ♥ 12:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Borders on WP:BLP1E Niteshift36 (talk) 06:26, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep I believe deletion would be premature; events in north Mayo are currently taking a similar turn to last summer's. Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 11:16, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - completely non-notable. Canterbury Tail talk 12:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per Canterbury Tail. --Kuzaar-T-C- 12:30, 10 June 2009 (UTC)