Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agilo for Scrum: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:50, 10 June 2009

Agilo for Scrum

Contested prod. Article is about a software program, but I can't find any reliable sources that support its notability. Links provided are either to an official site, press release, or articles written by the software's maintainer. TNXMan 18:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:31, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well also Trac is about a Software Program, and all the pages belonging to Open Source and Project Management Tool are Software Programs so what? Agilo is Free, and Open Source, has a Growing Community of people and is enlisted on Open Source platforms as well. 80.153.177.13 (talk) 07:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable, secondary sources seem to be available to demonstrate the notability of this software. None of the claims have reliable sources (other than the subject itself) backing them up, so the result of this discussion should be delete. The Seeker 4 Talk 13:23, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are no reliable secondary sources that provide any evidence this is notable. --Cameron Scott (talk) 13:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone. ╟─Treasury Tag►sundries─╢ 15:09, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly fails the GNG. When oh when will we have an A7 speedy for software? On further reflection I think it's a borderline G11 speedy with a big dollop of WP:NOTMANUAL. ukexpat (talk) 15:45, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep We have at least 2 sources which establish notability: [1], [2] Unomi (talk) 17:40, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Borderline G11 for non-notable software; the above references do not suffice to establish notability. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:57, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This one of the most used Scrum Tools (and the best Scrum Open Source Tool for sure). I think there was also some article in the well known German iX magazine about it. But the article needs some love for sure. If we can keep this a bit longer, I can try to improve it. --Robjenssen (talk) 12:28, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, notability not established. --Kuzaar^-T-C- 12:50, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 12:28, 10 June 2009 edit Robjenssen (talk \| contribs) 2 edits voted to keep Agilo For Scrum ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:50, 10 June 2009 edit undo Kuzaar (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,676 edits m delete Next edit →
Line 19:		Line 19:

	* '''Keep''' This one of the most used Scrum Tools (and the best Scrum Open Source Tool for sure). I think there was also some article in the well known German iX magazine about it. But the article needs some love for sure. If we can keep this a bit longer, I can try to improve it. --[[User:Robjenssen\|Robjenssen]] ([[User talk:Robjenssen\|talk]]) 12:28, 10 June 2009 (UTC)		* '''Keep''' This one of the most used Scrum Tools (and the best Scrum Open Source Tool for sure). I think there was also some article in the well known German iX magazine about it. But the article needs some love for sure. If we can keep this a bit longer, I can try to improve it. --[[User:Robjenssen\|Robjenssen]] ([[User talk:Robjenssen\|talk]]) 12:28, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
			*'''Delete''', notability not established. --[[User:Kuzaar\|Kuzaar]]<sup>-[[User talk:Kuzaar\|T]]-[[Special:Contributions/Kuzaar\|C]]-</sup> 12:50, 10 June 2009 (UTC)