Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Swiss municipalities/Article title conventions: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:43, 12 June 2009

This project subpage was created in a single edit by a single editor in 2005; it has never been discussed, and has been referred to twice in this period. It ne'er was consensus of more than Docu, and is an undesirable guideline in that makes unsourced controversial claims of fact. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Before discussing all the points you raised, can you detail what you mean with "unsourced controversial claims of fact"? -- User:Docu 22:43, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:51, 31 May 2009 edit Pmanderson (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 62,751 edits why historic		Revision as of 22:43, 12 June 2009 edit undo Docu (talk \| contribs) 97,802 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This project subpage was created in a single edit by a single editor in 2005; it has never been discussed, and has been referred to ''twice'' in this period. It ne'er was consensus of more than Docu, and is an undesirable guideline in that makes unsourced controversial claims of fact. [[User:Pmanderson\|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson\|PMAnderson]]</small> 02:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC)		This project subpage was created in a single edit by a single editor in 2005; it has never been discussed, and has been referred to ''twice'' in this period. It ne'er was consensus of more than Docu, and is an undesirable guideline in that makes unsourced controversial claims of fact. [[User:Pmanderson\|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson\|PMAnderson]]</small> 02:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

			:Before discussing all the points you raised, can you detail what you mean with "unsourced controversial claims of fact"? -- User:Docu 22:43, 12 June 2009 (UTC)