Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Game events: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Game events: delete |
Orrelly Man (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Delete'''. Entirely [[WP:OR|original research]], not [[WP:N|notable]]. [[User:Haipa Doragon|Haipa Doragon]] ([[User talk:Haipa Doragon|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Haipa Doragon|contributions]]) 01:43, 13 June 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Entirely [[WP:OR|original research]], not [[WP:N|notable]]. [[User:Haipa Doragon|Haipa Doragon]] ([[User talk:Haipa Doragon|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Haipa Doragon|contributions]]) 01:43, 13 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. This category and its subcategories are terms the author made up (or is using idiosyncratically), and often collect many dissimilar events. The only source to use these terms is the single website linked prominently at the bottom of the page. - [[User:A Man In Black|A Man In <font color="black">'''Bl♟ck'''</font>]] <small>([[User talk:A_Man_In_Black|conspire]] - [[Special:Contributions/A Man In Black|past ops]])</small> 05:20, 13 June 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. This category and its subcategories are terms the author made up (or is using idiosyncratically), and often collect many dissimilar events. The only source to use these terms is the single website linked prominently at the bottom of the page. - [[User:A Man In Black|A Man In <font color="black">'''Bl♟ck'''</font>]] <small>([[User talk:A_Man_In_Black|conspire]] - [[Special:Contributions/A Man In Black|past ops]])</small> 05:20, 13 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. I added the original prod after finding this pointless list in an inappropriate category. There is conflict of interest here and the article is an attempt to advertise the quoted website which has no notability. Adds absolutely no value to WP. --[[User:Orrelly Man|Orrelly Man]] ([[User talk:Orrelly Man|talk]]) 06:36, 13 June 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:36, 13 June 2009
- Game events (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested PROD without reason. I cannot find anything that can provide any verifiability of this term. It also looks like it contains original research and seems to promote the website http://www.eventsforgamers.com/. MuZemike 01:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike 01:34, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Entirely original research, not notable. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 01:43, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. This category and its subcategories are terms the author made up (or is using idiosyncratically), and often collect many dissimilar events. The only source to use these terms is the single website linked prominently at the bottom of the page. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 05:20, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. I added the original prod after finding this pointless list in an inappropriate category. There is conflict of interest here and the article is an attempt to advertise the quoted website which has no notability. Adds absolutely no value to WP. --Orrelly Man (talk) 06:36, 13 June 2009 (UTC)