:Ya, plus at this point i think i've reached a burnout point with policy choices.. seems like time for a hiatus. Thanks... [[User:Quaeler|Quaeler]] ([[User talk:Quaeler#top|talk]]) 16:10, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
:Ya, plus at this point i think i've reached a burnout point with policy choices.. seems like time for a hiatus. Thanks... [[User:Quaeler|Quaeler]] ([[User talk:Quaeler#top|talk]]) 16:10, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
As of 1.July.2009 i have taken an indeterminate break from editing Wikipedia.
To keep discussion threads complete, i will reply to your posts here; on pages where i have posted myself, i will watch them and expect replies there.
This is not the page for content disputes; that belongs on the relevant article's talk page.
Yes, i Assume Bad Faith in cases of vandalism. This is not the place to wax philosophic with me about that.
Please sign and date your entries by appending ~~~~ at the end of your edit.
If you're looking for a previous thread, threads are automatically archived after 5 days; check the archives via the box to the right. Do not modify archived threads.
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.
One of the more dumb things i've read
Um, no. I'm sorry, but you're wrong. I never made an unconstructive edit. I saw no activity on the merger discussion for months. I explained myself on the positive liberty discussion page. An apology would be nice. 24.174.82.195 (talk) 11:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
To recap: you appear to believe that your comment on a talk page not linked to the discussion of the text you deleted allows you to delete a template and be too lazy to simply type a reason in that text box right above the save buttons. I'll tell you what would be nice... That being said, i think it's fantastic you've gone back after the deletion, after my warning, to then actually put something on the talk page. Does doing the right thing eight and a half hours after the fact earn you a shiny star and an apology? "Um, no." Quaeler (talk) 16:31, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Vandal
Users have the right to remove warnings from their pages. Do not restore them once removed, lest you be blocked along with him. --King ♣Talk16:03, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ya, plus at this point i think i've reached a burnout point with policy choices.. seems like time for a hiatus. Thanks... Quaeler (talk) 16:10, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
