Talk:Nothronychus: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
J. Spencer (talk | contribs) m comment |
comment |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::If someone could post or point to an image of the actual remains that may help. A google image search finds two rather different interpretations...[[User:86.8.136.217|86.8.136.217]] 22:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC) |
::If someone could post or point to an image of the actual remains that may help. A google image search finds two rather different interpretations...[[User:86.8.136.217|86.8.136.217]] 22:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
:::Here's close cousin [http://www.palaeos.com/Vertebrates/Units/340Theropoda/Images/TherizinosauridaeA1.jpg ''Erlikosaurus''] [[User:J. Spencer|J. Spencer]] 23:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC) |
:::Here's close cousin [http://www.palaeos.com/Vertebrates/Units/340Theropoda/Images/TherizinosauridaeA1.jpg ''Erlikosaurus''] [[User:J. Spencer|J. Spencer]] 23:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Head and neck of N. graffami ? == |
|||
The caption of the image in the taxobox was saying that it was a cast of the skull and neck of N. graffami. The animal is known from a nearly complete postcranial skeleton, missing the skull and most of the neck, so it was kind of odd to display the cast of the only missing parts. [[User:ArthurWeasley|ArthurWeasley]] ([[User talk:ArthurWeasley|talk]]) 20:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:25, 15 July 2009
![]() | Dinosaurs Unassessed | |||||||||
|
'Toothless beak' and 'small mouth with leaf shaped teeth' ??? As far as I know, no theropods ever developed into fully fledged veggies. I'm not an expert so have not edited the text, but it needs looking at. 86.8.136.217 22:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Actually (I don't have the refs on-hand, but it's discussed in the second edition of The Dinosauria), paleontologists are pretty comfortable with the idea of therizinosaurs as herbivores. J. Spencer 22:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- If someone could post or point to an image of the actual remains that may help. A google image search finds two rather different interpretations...86.8.136.217 22:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Here's close cousin Erlikosaurus J. Spencer 23:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- If someone could post or point to an image of the actual remains that may help. A google image search finds two rather different interpretations...86.8.136.217 22:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Head and neck of N. graffami ?
The caption of the image in the taxobox was saying that it was a cast of the skull and neck of N. graffami. The animal is known from a nearly complete postcranial skeleton, missing the skull and most of the neck, so it was kind of odd to display the cast of the only missing parts. ArthurWeasley (talk) 20:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)