Talk:Nothronychus: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:27, 15 July 2009

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

'Toothless beak' and 'small mouth with leaf shaped teeth' ??? As far as I know, no theropods ever developed into fully fledged veggies. I'm not an expert so have not edited the text, but it needs looking at. 86.8.136.217 22:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually (I don't have the refs on-hand, but it's discussed in the second edition of The Dinosauria), paleontologists are pretty comfortable with the idea of therizinosaurs as herbivores. J. Spencer 22:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If someone could post or point to an image of the actual remains that may help. A google image search finds two rather different interpretations...86.8.136.217 22:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's close cousin Erlikosaurus J. Spencer 23:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Head and neck of N. graffami ?

The caption of the image in the taxobox was saying that it was a cast of the skull and neck of N. graffami. The animal is known from a nearly complete postcranial skeleton, missing the skull and most of the neck, so it was kind of odd to display the cast of the only substantially missing parts. ArthurWeasley (talk) 20:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 :::Here's close cousin [http://www.palaeos.com/Vertebrates/Units/340Theropoda/Images/TherizinosauridaeA1.jpg ''Erlikosaurus''] [[User:J. Spencer|J. Spencer]] 23:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
-== Head and neck of N. graffami ? ==
+== Head and neck of ''N. graffami'' ? ==
-The caption of the image in the taxobox was saying that it was a cast of the skull and neck of N. graffami. The animal is known from a nearly complete postcranial skeleton, missing the skull and most of the neck, so it was kind of odd to display the cast of the only missing parts. [[User:ArthurWeasley|ArthurWeasley]] ([[User talk:ArthurWeasley|talk]]) 20:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
+The caption of the image in the taxobox was saying that it was a cast of the skull and neck of ''N. graffami''. The animal is known from a nearly complete postcranial skeleton, missing the skull and most of the neck, so it was kind of odd to display the cast of the only substantially missing parts. [[User:ArthurWeasley|ArthurWeasley]] ([[User talk:ArthurWeasley|talk]]) 20:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)