Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ackerman global enterprises: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:58, 22 July 2009

Ackerman global enterprises

Not notable. Unsourced; claims to be so secret that their products and industry sector are "confidential". Huh? Only Google hits are WIkipedia and the company's own webpage. Possible hoax/overactive imagination. Hairhorn (talk) 04:16, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a hoax, the company is secretive because they deal with wealthy clientele. The company has just created a website recently for these clientele to access billing online - a new feature. One of the services clienetele have recieved in the past is the AGE Awards for financial purposes. If Ackerman Global Enterprises is going public with a website, it would make sense for people who wander on to the website to have a source that can explain (to some extent) what the company does. However, most of the services are still secretive. A7 also is so vague that it can be used to delete any article on no basis. Is that not on the eye of the beholder? --Efieryman898 (talk) 04:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete No claim to natability, not sure really if the article should be retained. Æon ^{Insanity Now!} 04:58, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 04:58, 22 July 2009 edit Aeon1006 (talk \| contribs) 6,584 edits →‎Ackerman global enterprises: weak del ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:58, 22 July 2009 edit undo Aeon1006 (talk \| contribs) 6,584 edits forgot to sign...oops Next edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:
	A7 also is so vague that it can be used to delete any article on no basis. Is that not on the eye of the beholder? --[[User:Efieryman898\|Efieryman898]] ([[User talk:Efieryman898\|talk]]) 04:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC)		A7 also is so vague that it can be used to delete any article on no basis. Is that not on the eye of the beholder? --[[User:Efieryman898\|Efieryman898]] ([[User talk:Efieryman898\|talk]]) 04:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

	* '''Weak Delete''' No claim to natability, not sure really if the article should be retained.		* '''Weak Delete''' No claim to natability, not sure really if the article should be retained. <font color="SteelBlue">[[User:Aeon1006\|Æon]]</font> <font color="red"><sup>[[User talk:Aeon1006\|Insanity Now!]]</sup></font> 04:58, 22 July 2009 (UTC)