Jump to content

User talk:Tommy814: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tommy814 (talk | contribs)
Line 22: Line 22:


I don't know if you are a re-incarnation of a previously blocked editor or not. At this point, I don't care if you are. As I told another editor when they voiced their suspicion, I will engage you in discussion as long as you conduct yourself reasonably. So far, you've done so. So to me, you are either a different guy or the same guy who decided to engage in an adult discussion instead of the childish silliness that went on before. I have no issues with you at this point. And I've said the same thing in the sock puppet investigation. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 07:13, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
I don't know if you are a re-incarnation of a previously blocked editor or not. At this point, I don't care if you are. As I told another editor when they voiced their suspicion, I will engage you in discussion as long as you conduct yourself reasonably. So far, you've done so. So to me, you are either a different guy or the same guy who decided to engage in an adult discussion instead of the childish silliness that went on before. I have no issues with you at this point. And I've said the same thing in the sock puppet investigation. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 07:13, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

I don't know who these blocked people are but apparently they're making placing a damper on these conversations. I think our discussions have been fine, I've had no beef with you, I've presented what I thought was good stuff and you had very reasonable rebuttals. I thought that what trying to prove a controversy was all about.[[User:Tommy814|Tommy814]] ([[User talk:Tommy814#top|talk]]) 17:59, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:59, 28 July 2009


July 2009

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Frank Dux, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you.Template:Do not delete Theserialcomma (talk) 21:19, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have no close connection to anybody concerning this article and I'm not sure why I'm receiving this message.

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tommy814 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Theserialcomma (talk) 19:09, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't had any issues with you

I don't know if you are a re-incarnation of a previously blocked editor or not. At this point, I don't care if you are. As I told another editor when they voiced their suspicion, I will engage you in discussion as long as you conduct yourself reasonably. So far, you've done so. So to me, you are either a different guy or the same guy who decided to engage in an adult discussion instead of the childish silliness that went on before. I have no issues with you at this point. And I've said the same thing in the sock puppet investigation. Niteshift36 (talk) 07:13, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who these blocked people are but apparently they're making placing a damper on these conversations. I think our discussions have been fine, I've had no beef with you, I've presented what I thought was good stuff and you had very reasonable rebuttals. I thought that what trying to prove a controversy was all about.Tommy814 (talk) 17:59, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]