Talk:Bluebird K7: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Andy Dingley (talk | contribs) Re-assess state lower. We need content here, particularly images and also to sink the canard that it was a new boat in '67 |
→Past Tense: new section |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|B-Class-4=yes|B-Class-5=no}} |
|B-Class-4=yes|B-Class-5=no}} |
||
{{Ship infobox request}} |
{{Ship infobox request}} |
||
== Past Tense == |
|||
Should the article describe Bluebird in the past tense? The machine still exists after all, has been out of the lake for nearly a decade now, and is well on the way to being a fully functional hydroplane again. I know that most vessels, planes, cars etc that have been lost are refereed to in the past tense, but the restoration project makes Bluebird a special case. |
Revision as of 22:00, 31 July 2009
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Ships Start‑class | ||||||
|
Past Tense
Should the article describe Bluebird in the past tense? The machine still exists after all, has been out of the lake for nearly a decade now, and is well on the way to being a fully functional hydroplane again. I know that most vessels, planes, cars etc that have been lost are refereed to in the past tense, but the restoration project makes Bluebird a special case.