Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chocolate covered potato chips: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 12: Line 12:
*Obviously there are those who are clearly ignorant to certain foods or products, therefore from their ignorance make opinions or claims, which based on their ignorance, should be discounted in this discussion. Making opinions as to notability based on your opinion is not grounds for deletion. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sdub34|Sdub34]] ([[User talk:Sdub34|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sdub34|contribs]]) 02:50, 5 August 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
*Obviously there are those who are clearly ignorant to certain foods or products, therefore from their ignorance make opinions or claims, which based on their ignorance, should be discounted in this discussion. Making opinions as to notability based on your opinion is not grounds for deletion. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sdub34|Sdub34]] ([[User talk:Sdub34|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sdub34|contribs]]) 02:50, 5 August 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
**Lack of available sources is grounds for deletion, however. --<span style="background:#CC1010;color:#FFA0A0">'''&nbsp;Blanchardb'''&nbsp;</span>-<small><sup><span style="color:#A62428">[[User:Blanchardb|Me]]•[[User Talk:Blanchardb|MyEars]]•[[Special:Contributions/Blanchardb|MyMouth]]</span></sup></small>- timed 02:53, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
**Lack of available sources is grounds for deletion, however. --<span style="background:#CC1010;color:#FFA0A0">'''&nbsp;Blanchardb'''&nbsp;</span>-<small><sup><span style="color:#A62428">[[User:Blanchardb|Me]]•[[User Talk:Blanchardb|MyEars]]•[[Special:Contributions/Blanchardb|MyMouth]]</span></sup></small>- timed 02:53, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
*I'm glad the article is here, because I wanted to know what exactly chocolate potato chips were and if they were actual potatoes, and this was the best definition I found.

Revision as of 03:08, 5 August 2009

Chocolate covered potato chips

Chocolate covered potato chips (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Non-notable treat. The one reference in the article is actually an unwanted spam link to one company that makes this. Delete.  Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 00:39, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No references exist for this page. This item is more notable than many of the more obscure items listed on wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdub34 (talkcontribs) 00:52, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Per nom, no references. Triplestop x3 01:17, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No refs. Poorly written. Not notable? (Unrelated:chocolate covered potato chips sound disgusting IMHO) TheWeakWilled 02:45, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Obviously there are those who are clearly ignorant to certain foods or products, therefore from their ignorance make opinions or claims, which based on their ignorance, should be discounted in this discussion. Making opinions as to notability based on your opinion is not grounds for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdub34 (talkcontribs) 02:50, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Lack of available sources is grounds for deletion, however. -- Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 02:53, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]