User talk:68.50.128.120

User:162.6.97.3

You're a WP:SOCK of this anon, who is blocked. So you are, too. Remove this notice and I protect this page, too William M. Connolley (talk) 07:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

And its 1, 2, 3, what are we fighting for...

User talk:ABD – Somehow I’m still deemed in the bad graces of User talk:William M. Connolley, but I’d like to respond here (while it’s on my mind) to your recent posts with User talk:William M. Connelley and User talk:Coppertwig.

(User talk:162.6.97.3 can speak for himself or herself, and I expect will soon enough.)

I believe, ABD, there was some previous attempt to nudge you away from some assumptions. So here’s a push: As sure as Ms. Quick had a previous husband, is as SURE there is ABSOLUTELY NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST involving an IP editor who wanted to note previous marital information. NONE. Zero. Zilch. In particular, your IP geolocate is wrong. (It pains me to state here that for all his/her actions, a particular edit-warrior in this matter did a much better job of sleuthing.)

You have done much good, grasshopper, but obviously NOT on obvious, or ANY, conflict of interest. : )

Next: I think an IP editor’s “skill” had little to play in this psychodrama. An edit warrior played a system that really works (initially) against lowly IP editors. The only skill was to demonstrate, then or now, the discovery and introduction of a fact, albeit a flyspeck notation.

By the way, “skill” should always be defined at Wikipedia as fact-gathering and -offering, not as Wiki politics masquerading as “consensus.”

68.50.128.120 (talk) 22:03, 7 August 2009 (UTC)