Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Free Hans: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:10, 9 August 2009

Free Hans

Free Hans (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Free Hans/Archive.

Report date August 9 2009, 18:56 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

Benmols2 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Wolof359 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Evidence submitted by Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here)

Both users have been created when a user was blocked or recently unblocked, only for making it look like the blocked /unblocked account has been sockpuppeting. I know of some more so I will add them later, because I don't know the exact name. Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 18:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Benmols2 appears to be mirroring WebHamster's style. Far to closely to be a genuine sockpuppet of that user, its just too obvious that this is meant to look like that user. This needs to be looked into, and much more deeply then I could. A check on all involved IP's plus (if posible) a wider search to see if any other black Sock accounts exists masceradibng as WebHammster.Slatersteven (talk) 19:10, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

CheckUser requests

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: B (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism )

Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review. Requested by Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 18:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Conclusions

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 Both users have been created when a user was blocked or recently unblocked, only for making it look like the blocked /unblocked account has been sockpuppeting. I know of some more so I will add them later, because I don't know the exact name. [[User:Abce2|<font face="Fantasy" color="#3366FF">Abce2</font>]]|<small>[[User Talk:Abce2|<font face="Verdana" color="#0099AA">''Aww nuts!''</font>]][[User:Abce2/guestbook|<font face="Papyrus" color="#FFAA11">''Wribbit!(Sign here)''</font>]]</small> 18:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
+:The [[Benmols2]] appears to be mirroring [[WebHamster]]'s style. Far to closely to be a genuine sockpuppet of that user, its just  too obvious that this is meant to look like that user. This needs to be looked into, and much more deeply then I could. A check on all involved IP's plus (if posible) a wider search to see if any other black Sock accounts exists masceradibng as WebHammster.[[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 19:10, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 ;Comments by accused parties  &nbsp;&nbsp; <small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</span></small>