Talk:Lucid interval: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:17, 12 August 2009

Medicine: Neurology Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This information comes from events experienced by the writer and not from a peer reviewed journal.

What does this mean?! Is it the truth, or is it opinion? Should this be removed?? --69.203.73.148 (talk) 03:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously posted by someone unfamiliar with WP:NOR. It has been removed.--76.204.76.177 (talk) 06:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

change this statement structure

Currently it reads

"Because a patient may have a lucid interval, any head trauma is regarded as a medical emergency and receives emergency medical treatment even if the patient is conscious."

However, that is a fact that is patently false, as last shown when Natasha Richardson died. I propose the sentence is changed to something like this:

"Because a patient may have a lucid interval, any head trauma should be regarded as a medical emergency and emergency medical treatment should be administered even if the patient is conscious."

However, that makes the page sound like a medical handbook? Better options? Removing it altogether makes the page lose the real fact.

213.66.219.48 (talk) 07:17, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 --[[Special:Contributions/69.203.73.148|69.203.73.148]] ([[User talk:69.203.73.148|talk]]) 03:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 ::Obviously posted by someone unfamiliar with [[WP:NOR]].  It has been removed.--[[Special:Contributions/76.204.76.177|76.204.76.177]] ([[User talk:76.204.76.177|talk]]) 06:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
+== change this statement structure ==
+Currently it reads
+"Because a patient may have a lucid interval, any head trauma is regarded as a medical emergency and receives emergency medical treatment even if the patient is conscious."
+However, that is a fact that is patently false, as last shown when [[Natasha Richardson]] died. I propose the sentence is changed to something like this:
+"Because a patient may have a lucid interval, any head trauma should be regarded as a medical emergency and emergency medical treatment should be administered even if the patient is conscious."
+However, that makes the page sound like a medical handbook? Better options? Removing it altogether makes the page lose the real fact.
+[[Special:Contributions/213.66.219.48|213.66.219.48]] ([[User talk:213.66.219.48|talk]]) 07:17, 12 August 2009 (UTC)