Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Meteorological history of Hurricane Georges/archive1: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
initiating nomination
 
Line 6: Line 6:


I am nominating this for featured article because I feel that the article thoroughly covers the topic and meets FA standards. All thoughts and comments are welcome. [[User:Cyclonebiskit|Cyclonebiskit]] ([[User talk:Cyclonebiskit|talk]]) 04:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured article because I feel that the article thoroughly covers the topic and meets FA standards. All thoughts and comments are welcome. [[User:Cyclonebiskit|Cyclonebiskit]] ([[User talk:Cyclonebiskit|talk]]) 04:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

'''Comment'''. Alt text is present and mostly good (thanks), but the alt text for the lead (infobox) image is merely "Track of Hurricane Georges", which doesn't convey much info to the visually impaired reader, and also contains a claim (that this is the track of Hurricane Georges) that can't easily be verified by a non-expert. Please reword it to not use the name, and to briefly describe where the track goes. Thanks. [[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] ([[User talk:Eubulides|talk]]) 14:42, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:42, 26 August 2009

Nominator(s): Cyclonebiskit (talk) 04:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured article because I feel that the article thoroughly covers the topic and meets FA standards. All thoughts and comments are welcome. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 04:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Alt text is present and mostly good (thanks), but the alt text for the lead (infobox) image is merely "Track of Hurricane Georges", which doesn't convey much info to the visually impaired reader, and also contains a claim (that this is the track of Hurricane Georges) that can't easily be verified by a non-expert. Please reword it to not use the name, and to briefly describe where the track goes. Thanks. Eubulides (talk) 14:42, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]