User talk:Vanished User 1004: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 73: Line 73:
I don't think it's really a COI, I was just disclosing my connections with GameX -- in fact it is counter to my interests to remove references to the event. I felt that the reference in the article was written too much like an advertisement, and it was the comment from the history ("one to watch") that really pushed me to remove the reference completely. Anyway, I appreciate your edit, it's an improvement over the previous version. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dariusk|Dariusk]] ([[User talk:Dariusk|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dariusk|contribs]]) 15:03, 27 August 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I don't think it's really a COI, I was just disclosing my connections with GameX -- in fact it is counter to my interests to remove references to the event. I felt that the reference in the article was written too much like an advertisement, and it was the comment from the history ("one to watch") that really pushed me to remove the reference completely. Anyway, I appreciate your edit, it's an improvement over the previous version. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dariusk|Dariusk]] ([[User talk:Dariusk|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dariusk|contribs]]) 15:03, 27 August 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Not a problem. I just wanted to be sure you had seen the [[wp:COI]] article. All the best and happy editing! :) [[User:Sinneed|- sinneed]] ([[User talk:Sinneed#top|talk]]) 15:09, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
:Not a problem. I just wanted to be sure you had seen the [[wp:COI]] article. All the best and happy editing! :) [[User:Sinneed|- sinneed]] ([[User talk:Sinneed#top|talk]]) 15:09, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

== Since you got me blocked for nothing..... ==

I hope that being a normal human being, you must be sad that why [[User talk:98.207.210.210]] was blocked alongwith some other unknown wikipedia user [[User: Gurbinder_singh1]] and [[User:Satanoid]] through your [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Gurbinder_singh1/Archive RFC] eventhough no checkuser work was done and eventhough it was me, i.e. [[User talk:98.207.210.210]] only who exposed [[User:satanoid]]'s history over [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#user:Heliosphere_at_Sikh_extremism here]. You have already learnt that [[User: Gurbinder_singh1]] got nothing to do with [[User: satanoid]] through these [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Heliosphere/Archive proofs], so what are you doing to get him and me justice ? and get our IP addresses/accounts cleared. Please do not assume that it is respective user's responsibility to get justice, please take an initiative to get justice around you. "Justice" is such a beautiful word that it must give you peace and happiness once you achieve it. --[[Special:Contributions/98.207.210.210|98.207.210.210]] ([[User talk:98.207.210.210|talk]]) 08:02, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:02, 29 August 2009

Hello, and Welcome!

I have decided that posts here will generally be answered both here, and on the poster's talk page. I will generally include a copy of the post I am answering as well.
Please discuss article edits on the appropriate article talk pages, and be wp:CIVIL.
At my sole discretion, posts I feel don't meet these requirements will be either archived, if I value them, or simply deleted, if I do not.

If this displeases you, please feel free to post elsewhere. Please see wp:talk for additional guidance.

I spend a bit of time patrolling recent changes.

When I make a mistake, please note:

  • I am only a human, I promise I will make mistakes. I revert things that appear to be clear vandalism, or dubious and unsourced, or most aggressively, dubious and unsourced/weakly-sourced and Biographical. I think that Biographical articles are the greatest risk that Wikipedia faces.
  • When you find I have made a mistake, please undo my edit and say why in the edit description. If you are VERY kind, and there is a useful Wikipedia guideline or consensus, please link it. :)
  • I would mildly prefer that you not leave me a template message if I've made a bad edit.
  • If I have reverted your edit, whether vandalism, otherwise problematic, or mistakenly, please don't abuse me with vandalism here. It will be quickly reverted.
  • I am not here all the time. If you leave me a message and I don't respond quickly, please don't be offended. I will get back to you as soon as I can after I see your message.

Other things:

  • I am not an admin. I will never be an admin. I am too loud, too wrong too often, way too politically incorrect, and too unable to learn the "kagillion" WP rules. I am an editor. I will do my best to be a useful Wikipedia editor. That is all.
  • I am not going to look up your sources for you. If you add content and I flag it {{CN}}, or cut it to the talk page for possible inclusion, beating me up... because you did a quick SuperWombatSearchEngine9 query and found the source you should have included the 1st time... will only make me smile.
  • I make small edits. I put an edit summary on each one, almost without fail. Thus, if an article is badly wounded, I may make 100 edits to it to fix 100 spelling, grammar, structure, and sourcing errors. Please try to survive somehow. Screaming at me that I am editing too much will again only make me smile.
  • If someone posts on a talk page covering 23 points, I may answer with a 23 point response. This *absolutely enrages* some individuals. As a courtesy, I will attempt to remember their preferences, and not reply to their posts. For those times I forget, I apologize in advance, and I invite the reader to ignore my response: I will do my best.
  • In those rare cases where an editor cannot even bear to read a talk page where I post, if the article is one I don't care about, I won't post there any more. If it is, however, I again apologize in advance, and again I invite the reader to ignore my response.
One day, a wise man listened impassively as his critics berated and insulted him during a discussion.
After the end of the discussion, an observer asked him how it made him feel to be treated so.
The elder smiled for a moment, then said "It makes me very happy."
A student, who had been upset already, demanded "How can it make you happy to be treated so!?!?"
His teacher explained, still smiling, "Because, my impetuous young friend, I am not them."

Archive 1 - 2008 September - 2009 February 15 - any previous, see History, sorry
Archive 2 - 2009 February 15 - 2009 August 20

Please add new sections at the BOTTOM

- sinneed (talk) 01:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's About Time You Got One!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your Vulcan like work ethic and your Vulcan like logic (which is correct but infuriates me :-) ). --Sikh-History 11:06, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your message. No worries. Even though we ended up in issues in the past, but I still appreciate your efforts. I will co-operate with you and will expect the same. Every issue has a solution :) ... Regards ....--99.51.223.161 (talk) 07:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:International Game Developers Association

I agree with your edit of my comment on the Talk page however I would just like to assure you that had I made an edit to the IGDA article, it would of course have been from a NPOV. Due a prolonged absence from Wikipedia (and the loss of an older account due to a forgotten email address) I failed to remember that poor sourcing and strong opinion in non-article space is also in violation of Wikipedia conduct and I will adhere to this in future; my opinions shall be kept to myself. Thank you for your reminder and I do hope this error will not affect your opinion on future edits I hope to make to other articles. --Glitchd (talk) 15:01, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your help requested

Sinneed, your help is urgently requested on the "Robert Lanza" page. It seems as though we're starting from scratch over exactly the same wording that was resolved on the "Bicoentrism" page. Thanks WikiWatch31 (talk) 20:53, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The admin involved has made it clear that I am my talk page posting style is unwelcome on talk pages that admin frequents. I have no expectation of posting on talk pages where the admin is working, as a courtesy. I wouldn't have the job on a bad bet, and strongly support those who do. My editing and especially talk page style is quite QUITE offensive to some, and I avoid inflicting it on those so affected.- sinneed (talk) 20:55, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've done an incredible job on the biocentrism page (dealing with all these people deserves a medal)In any case, you have my thanks WikiWatch31 (talk) 21:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have your talk page on watch, I am happy to answer you there.- sinneed (talk)

Meh

I knew someone would fix it... what I was perplexed by was the fact that the article displayed as if the Javascript/template was properly reading "uncollased" as "uncollapsed"... I need to go have a look at the code again. --Izno (talk) 21:34, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Betting on 1st-letter-check... maybe 1st 2 letters. If it were I, I would have used only the "U" and "C" unless there were other options. :)- sinneed (talk) 21:37, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zucchini

This is interesting [1]. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:02, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: IGDA COI, GameX Edit

I don't think it's really a COI, I was just disclosing my connections with GameX -- in fact it is counter to my interests to remove references to the event. I felt that the reference in the article was written too much like an advertisement, and it was the comment from the history ("one to watch") that really pushed me to remove the reference completely. Anyway, I appreciate your edit, it's an improvement over the previous version. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dariusk (talkcontribs) 15:03, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. I just wanted to be sure you had seen the wp:COI article. All the best and happy editing! :) - sinneed (talk) 15:09, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you got me blocked for nothing.....

I hope that being a normal human being, you must be sad that why User talk:98.207.210.210 was blocked alongwith some other unknown wikipedia user User: Gurbinder_singh1 and User:Satanoid through your RFC eventhough no checkuser work was done and eventhough it was me, i.e. User talk:98.207.210.210 only who exposed User:satanoid's history over here. You have already learnt that User: Gurbinder_singh1 got nothing to do with User: satanoid through these proofs, so what are you doing to get him and me justice ? and get our IP addresses/accounts cleared. Please do not assume that it is respective user's responsibility to get justice, please take an initiative to get justice around you. "Justice" is such a beautiful word that it must give you peace and happiness once you achieve it. --98.207.210.210 (talk) 08:02, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]