Talk:Shark Bait (film): Difference between revisions
→False advertsing: new section |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Isn't it just called "The Reef" in the US? and does anyone know how to get the us poster? Thanks! [[User:Ehccheehcche|Ehccheehcche]] ([[User talk:Ehccheehcche|talk]]) 02:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC) |
Isn't it just called "The Reef" in the US? and does anyone know how to get the us poster? Thanks! [[User:Ehccheehcche|Ehccheehcche]] ([[User talk:Ehccheehcche|talk]]) 02:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
== False advertsing == |
|||
Should it be meantined that, in [[Vietnam]], they actually '''dare''' call this '''Nemo 2'''? No, seriously, I'm not joking, my dad just got back from Vietnam and they actually think this is Nemo 2. I'm not sure if they think it is or if they just advertise it as such because no one would want to buy this, but it even says on the cover '''Nemo 2'''. Are they that gullible?! You can tell this isn't Nemo 2, but a rip-off of Nemo. I mean, the plot is eactly the same only it's inferior and embarrising. I remember last time dad went (to Vietnam) and I was like, I '''know''' there is no Nemo 2. I thought it would be Shark Tale (which I never saw), but no, it's this. And it's stupid! The character is called Pi and not Nemo anyway! So I think this should be on the article (it meantins critizim and the rip-off debatate, but not that it's advertized as Nemo 2 in Vietnam). Sorry but I think we should complain. If you see the imdb, you can see most people think this movie is rubbish, and I am no exeption. I think if we meantined this [[Wikipedia]] would be a better place. [[User:CDrive655|CDrive655]] ([[User talk:CDrive655|talk]]) 21:16, 1 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:16, 1 September 2009
Film: Korean Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
Korea Stub‑class | |||||||||||||
|
I haven't heard about this film, or can find many sources on it. Therefore I couldn't add more info. Anyone know where there's info about this? and we should also have the front cover.........
United states
Isn't it just called "The Reef" in the US? and does anyone know how to get the us poster? Thanks! Ehccheehcche (talk) 02:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
False advertsing
Should it be meantined that, in Vietnam, they actually dare call this Nemo 2? No, seriously, I'm not joking, my dad just got back from Vietnam and they actually think this is Nemo 2. I'm not sure if they think it is or if they just advertise it as such because no one would want to buy this, but it even says on the cover Nemo 2. Are they that gullible?! You can tell this isn't Nemo 2, but a rip-off of Nemo. I mean, the plot is eactly the same only it's inferior and embarrising. I remember last time dad went (to Vietnam) and I was like, I know there is no Nemo 2. I thought it would be Shark Tale (which I never saw), but no, it's this. And it's stupid! The character is called Pi and not Nemo anyway! So I think this should be on the article (it meantins critizim and the rip-off debatate, but not that it's advertized as Nemo 2 in Vietnam). Sorry but I think we should complain. If you see the imdb, you can see most people think this movie is rubbish, and I am no exeption. I think if we meantined this Wikipedia would be a better place. CDrive655 (talk) 21:16, 1 September 2009 (UTC)