Talk:Tazarotene: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:29, 4 September 2009

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This whole article sounds like an ad. It is not neutral, and it reads like it was written by a drug rep. The lack of citations is a key factor.

Really? What part seems NPOV to you? The part where the article states what conditions the drug is approved for treating, or the part where the common side effects are listed? This article reads like a typical patient information sheet or drug advisory. --72.188.235.81 03:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are many inaccuracies in this article. Tazarotene has proven more effective than Tretinion for both acne and photoaging in any single clinical trial, of which there have been many. Just search Pubmed. It is also not true that there are only limited benefits of Tazarotene for photodamage; the effects are profound. I would find you the studies if I cared.

Revision as of 03:46, 24 August 2007 edit 72.188.235.81 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:29, 4 September 2009 edit undo 91.148.156.12 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:

	::Really? What part seems NPOV to you? The part where the article states what conditions the drug is approved for treating, or the part where the common side effects are listed? This article reads like a typical patient information sheet or drug advisory. --[[User:72.188.235.81\|72.188.235.81]] 03:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)		::Really? What part seems NPOV to you? The part where the article states what conditions the drug is approved for treating, or the part where the common side effects are listed? This article reads like a typical patient information sheet or drug advisory. --[[User:72.188.235.81\|72.188.235.81]] 03:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

			There are many inaccuracies in this article. Tazarotene has proven more effective than Tretinion for both acne and photoaging in any single clinical trial, of which there have been many. Just search Pubmed. It is also not true that there are only limited benefits of Tazarotene for photodamage; the effects are profound. I would find you the studies if I cared.