Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pharmacology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

WikiProject Pharmacology (Rated NA-class)
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 NA  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 


Prototype drug[edit]

Just to let you know that I created a stub prototype drug and linked it from several appropriate articles, as I felt that we don't have even a definition of this pretty basic topic. I confess knowing very little about pharmacology so I'm leaving it to the wikiproject to decide whether a standalone article is warranted or it should be merged into drug class. However, I feel that it could potentially grow into a list of prototype drugs, should anyone venture to compile one. (Although not a RS, it's a common enough thing in medical classes such as [1]). No such user (talk) 14:55, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Cefiderocol[edit]

A new experimental drug, Cefiderocol, has hit the mainstream news. I've created a stub for it, complete with drugbox template, but I can't work out to make it auto-fill from the data already there in Wikidata. -- The Anome (talk) 17:06, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Featured quality source review RFC[edit]

Editors in this WikiProject may be interested in the featured quality source review RFC that has been ongoing. It would change the featured article candidate process (FAC) so that source reviews would need to occur prior to any other reviews for FAC. Your comments are appreciated. --IznoRepeat (talk) 21:51, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Input requested[edit]

[2] Enigmamsg 00:18, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

I notified WT:MED. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:55, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Levofloxacin during pregnancy[edit]

The lead says the risk appears to be low, but I can't access the source on Google books. The body basically says "don't know", which is true AFAIK. Can somebody please check source [5]? Tx, --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 07:49, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Reference 5 has a webarchive available which does confirm low risk. Klbrain (talk) 00:42, 30 November 2018 (UTC)