Jump to content

User talk:68.251.158.126: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 9: Line 9:


as per [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|the three revert rule]], no editor should revert an article in part or whole more than three times in 24 hours, or your account may be blocked. you are approaching this limit. thank you. --[[User:Heah|Heah]] <sup>[[User_talk:Heah|talk]]</sup> 22:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
as per [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|the three revert rule]], no editor should revert an article in part or whole more than three times in 24 hours, or your account may be blocked. you are approaching this limit. thank you. --[[User:Heah|Heah]] <sup>[[User_talk:Heah|talk]]</sup> 22:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. It's odd, but every time I edit the page, within minutes someone reverts it back. I suspect it's the same person each time. Have you informed them of the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|the three revert rule]] as well? They are clearly in violation.

[[User:68.251.158.126|68.251.158.126]] 23:05, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:05, 15 December 2005

Please explain your edits of Alkyl nitrites on Talk:Alkyl nitrites. As it stands, they stand unreferenced and unexplained. Thank you. --Nlu (talk) 04:08, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please, would you explain your edits of Alkyhl nitrites

In the interest of a neutral and accurate Wikipedia, would you explain your own edits of Alkyl nitrites on Talk:Alkyl nitrites. As it is, yours stand unreferenced and unexplained.

three revert rule

hi-

as per the three revert rule, no editor should revert an article in part or whole more than three times in 24 hours, or your account may be blocked. you are approaching this limit. thank you. --Heah talk 22:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It's odd, but every time I edit the page, within minutes someone reverts it back. I suspect it's the same person each time. Have you informed them of the the three revert rule as well? They are clearly in violation.

68.251.158.126 23:05, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]