Jump to content

Talk:Earth mass: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
HarryAlffa (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPMeasure|class=Stub|importance=Mid}}
{{WPMeasure|class=Stub|importance=Mid}}
{{WPSpace|astronomy=yes}}
{{WPGEOLOGY}}


== measurement ==
== measurement ==

Revision as of 06:12, 22 September 2009

WikiProject iconMeasurement Stub‑class (defunct)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Template:WPSpace

WikiProject iconGeology Unassessed
WikiProject iconTalk:Earth mass is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

measurement

How is this currently best measured? By its gravitational influence (combining satellite orbit data with Cavendish-like experiments into gravitation) or by summing its constituents (combining geographic, seismic and materials data)? Cesiumfrog (talk) 06:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anybody care to work out how many atoms this mass equates to? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abundance_of_elements_in_Earth%27s_crust would probably help. Smartse (talk) 12:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stub

Wikipedia:Stub category applies to those articles with no more than "rudimentary" information.

While very short articles are likely to be stubs, there are some subjects about which there is very little that can be written.

This article is not a stub, there's just not much more that should be written, more could, but it would be "inflation" for the sake of it. If you really think it can never be more than a stub, then {{Copy to Wiktionary}}. HarryAlffa (talk) 11:25, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]