Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 September 26: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
69dressings (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:This DVD cover is for the United States and by displaying it in the article you are allowing international viewers to visually see what the film is about, exactly. The poster in the infobox doesn't actually explain the film visually. If you look at it it's really just a poster of a guy and a girl with a frightening facial expression, where as the DVD cover directly says lust, horror and romance which is what the film is about. Also the DVD image relates to the DVD release section in the article that alone should be more than enough. [[Special:Contributions/99.243.97.117|99.243.97.117]] ([[User talk:99.243.97.117|talk]]) 00:38, 27 September 2009 (UTC) |
:This DVD cover is for the United States and by displaying it in the article you are allowing international viewers to visually see what the film is about, exactly. The poster in the infobox doesn't actually explain the film visually. If you look at it it's really just a poster of a guy and a girl with a frightening facial expression, where as the DVD cover directly says lust, horror and romance which is what the film is about. Also the DVD image relates to the DVD release section in the article that alone should be more than enough. [[Special:Contributions/99.243.97.117|99.243.97.117]] ([[User talk:99.243.97.117|talk]]) 00:38, 27 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
::Nonsense. The DVD cover doesn't "explain the film visually" any more than the infobox poster, and what it ''says'' on the cover is irrelevant because it doesn't tell the reader anything that the article text doesn't (or shouldn't). We're not here to sell the DVD. [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 12:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC) |
::Nonsense. The DVD cover doesn't "explain the film visually" any more than the infobox poster, and what it ''says'' on the cover is irrelevant because it doesn't tell the reader anything that the article text doesn't (or shouldn't). We're not here to sell the DVD. [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 12:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
:I kind of agree with 99.243.97.117. That makes more sense than what you wrote PC78. I think we needed anothers' point of view. You're right we're not trying to sell the DVD, but just the fact that it has a R1 DVD of it's own and has gone beyond Korea makes for a significant display of the DVD cover. And I thought Wiki allowed Non-Free images so long as they relate to the article. [[ |
:I kind of agree with 99.243.97.117. That makes more sense than what you wrote PC78. I think we needed anothers' point of view. You're right we're not trying to sell the DVD, but just the fact that it has a R1 DVD of it's own and has gone beyond Korea makes for a significant display of the DVD cover. And I thought Wiki allowed Non-Free images so long as they relate to the article. [[User:69dressings|69dressings]] ([[User talk:69dressings|talk]]) 17:54, 28 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 17:54, 28 September 2009
- - uploaded by 69dressings (notify | contribs).
- Not nearly enough coverage of the R1 DVD release at Thirst (2009 film) to justify a non-free image. It's relatively trivial information anyway, and the image holds no encyclopedic value. The main infobox image is more than sufficient here. PC78 (talk) 10:12, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- This DVD cover is for the United States and by displaying it in the article you are allowing international viewers to visually see what the film is about, exactly. The poster in the infobox doesn't actually explain the film visually. If you look at it it's really just a poster of a guy and a girl with a frightening facial expression, where as the DVD cover directly says lust, horror and romance which is what the film is about. Also the DVD image relates to the DVD release section in the article that alone should be more than enough. 99.243.97.117 (talk) 00:38, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Nonsense. The DVD cover doesn't "explain the film visually" any more than the infobox poster, and what it says on the cover is irrelevant because it doesn't tell the reader anything that the article text doesn't (or shouldn't). We're not here to sell the DVD. PC78 (talk) 12:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- I kind of agree with 99.243.97.117. That makes more sense than what you wrote PC78. I think we needed anothers' point of view. You're right we're not trying to sell the DVD, but just the fact that it has a R1 DVD of it's own and has gone beyond Korea makes for a significant display of the DVD cover. And I thought Wiki allowed Non-Free images so long as they relate to the article. 69dressings (talk) 17:54, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
